Resolving the body-order paradox of machine learning interatomic potentials

In many cases, the predictions of machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) can be interpreted as a sum of body-ordered contributions, which is explicit when the model is directly built on neighbor density correlation descriptors and is implicit when the model captures the correlations through the non-linear functions of low body-order terms. In both cases, the "effective body-orderedness" of MLIPs remains largely unexplained: how do the models decompose the total energy into body-ordered contributions, and how does their body-orderedness affect the accuracy and learning behavior? In answering these questions, we first discuss the complexities in imposing the many-body expansion on ab initio calculations at the atomic limit. Next, we train a curated set of MLIPs on datasets of hydrogen clusters and reveal the inherent tendency of the ML models to deduce their own, effective body-order trends, which are dependent on the model type and dataset makeup. Finally, we present different trends in the convergence of the body-orders and generalizability of the models, providing useful insights into the development of future MLIPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0303302
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving the body-order paradox of machine learning interatomic potentials

Federico Grasselli, Michele Ceriotti, Michelangelo Domina, Filippo Bigi et al.
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Resolving the body-order paradox of machine learning interatomic potentials

Federico Grasselli, Michele Ceriotti, Michelangelo Domina, Filippo Bigi, Tong Jiang, Joonho Lee, Sanggyu Chong
article en

Abstract

In many cases, the predictions of machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) can be interpreted as a sum of body-ordered contributions, which is explicit when the model is directly built on neighbor density correlation descriptors and is implicit when the model captures the correlations through the non-linear functions of low body-order terms. In both cases, the "effective body-orderedness" of MLIPs remains largely unexplained: how do the models decompose the total energy into body-ordered contributions, and how does their body-orderedness affect the accuracy and learning behavior? In answering these questions, we first discuss the complexities in imposing the many-body expansion on ab initio calculations at the atomic limit. Next, we train a curated set of MLIPs on datasets of hydrogen clusters and reveal the inherent tendency of the ML models to deduce their own, effective body-order trends, which are dependent on the model type and dataset makeup. Finally, we present different trends in the convergence of the body-orders and generalizability of the models, providing useful insights into the development of future MLIPs.

The Journal of Chemical PhysicsVol. 164(6)
Harvard University (US), Harvard University Press (US), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resolving the body-order paradox of machine learning interatomic potentials — Federico Grasselli, Michele Ceriotti, et al. · The Journal of Chemical Physics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS