Developmental Language Disorder as a Multidimensional Neurodevelopmental Spectrum: Implications for Diagnosis

Considerable gains in understanding the genetics and neurobiology of DLD provide new explanations for long-observed phenomena such as heterogeneity of presentation, phenotypic overlap with other neurodevelopmental conditions, and the challenges of diagnosis. Although categorical nosologies benefit diagnostic decision making, facilitate communication, and align well with bureaucratic systems, they offer overly simple ways of defining DLD. The presentation of DLD is broad rather than narrow, spectral rather than categorical, and dynamic rather than static; therefore, DLD is better described as a multidimensional spectral system than as a categorical entity. It is not practical or even advisable to abandon the traditional categorical framing of DLD at this point. However, maintaining awareness of the tension between the categorical framing and the spectral nature of DLD may improve diagnosis, prognosis, and alignment with the construct of neurodiversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_jslhr-25-00089
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developmental Language Disorder as a Multidimensional Neurodevelopmental Spectrum: Implications for Diagnosis

Karla K. McGregor, Krystal L. Werfel, Elena Plante, Lisa Goffman
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Language Development and Disorders
article

Developmental Language Disorder as a Multidimensional Neurodevelopmental Spectrum: Implications for Diagnosis

Karla K. McGregor, Krystal L. Werfel, Elena Plante, Lisa Goffman
article en

Abstract

Considerable gains in understanding the genetics and neurobiology of DLD provide new explanations for long-observed phenomena such as heterogeneity of presentation, phenotypic overlap with other neurodevelopmental conditions, and the challenges of diagnosis. Although categorical nosologies benefit diagnostic decision making, facilitate communication, and align well with bureaucratic systems, they offer overly simple ways of defining DLD. The presentation of DLD is broad rather than narrow, spectral rather than categorical, and dynamic rather than static; therefore, DLD is better described as a multidimensional spectral system than as a categorical entity. It is not practical or even advisable to abandon the traditional categorical framing of DLD at this point. However, maintaining awareness of the tension between the categorical framing and the spectral nature of DLD may improve diagnosis, prognosis, and alignment with the construct of neurodiversity.

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchVol. 68(12)
University of Arizona (US), Boys Town National Research Hospital (US)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.