The Incremental Yield of CMA Over Karyotype in Fetal Growth Restriction—A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

The main objective of our study was to conduct a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the incremental yield of chromosomal microarray analysis compared with karyotyping in cases of fetal growth restriction. Our review was designed according to the PRISMA guidelines. It included all observational studies that reported the results of CMA testing in fetuses diagnosed with growth restriction without additional findings (isolated FGR), with structural abnormalities (malformed FGR) and with the presence of additional findings that would not qualify as structural abnormalities (nonmalformed FGR). The study included 22 studies with a total of 2275 cases of affected fetuses that met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Combined data from these studies revealed an overall 3% incremental yield of CMA over karyotyping (95% CI 2%-5%) in isolated cases, an overall 4% incremental yield of CMA over karyotyping (95% CI 3%-5%) in nonmalformed FGR cases and an overall 10% incremental yield (95% CI -13%) in malformed FGR cases. Our findings may be useful in clinical practice to guide management options and the counseling of the couples to individualize patient care and facilitate clinicians when they come across such a common clinical entity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prenatal Diagnosis
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70022
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Incremental Yield of CMA Over Karyotype in Fetal Growth Restriction—A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Panagiotis G. Antsaklis, Evangelia Kontogeorgi, Vasilios Pergialiotis, Konstantinos Tasias et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

The Incremental Yield of CMA Over Karyotype in Fetal Growth Restriction—A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Panagiotis G. Antsaklis, Evangelia Kontogeorgi, Vasilios Pergialiotis, Konstantinos Tasias, Ioakeim Sapantzoglou, G. Daskalakis, Marianna Theodora, Angeliki Rouvali, Afroditi Pegkou
article en

Abstract

The main objective of our study was to conduct a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the incremental yield of chromosomal microarray analysis compared with karyotyping in cases of fetal growth restriction. Our review was designed according to the PRISMA guidelines. It included all observational studies that reported the results of CMA testing in fetuses diagnosed with growth restriction without additional findings (isolated FGR), with structural abnormalities (malformed FGR) and with the presence of additional findings that would not qualify as structural abnormalities (nonmalformed FGR). The study included 22 studies with a total of 2275 cases of affected fetuses that met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Combined data from these studies revealed an overall 3% incremental yield of CMA over karyotyping (95% CI 2%-5%) in isolated cases, an overall 4% incremental yield of CMA over karyotyping (95% CI 3%-5%) in nonmalformed FGR cases and an overall 10% incremental yield (95% CI -13%) in malformed FGR cases. Our findings may be useful in clinical practice to guide management options and the counseling of the couples to individualize patient care and facilitate clinicians when they come across such a common clinical entity.

Prenatal DiagnosisVol. 46(1)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Alexandra Hospital (GR)
Hellenic Academic Libraries Link
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.