How is preservice teachers’ gaze during classroom observation connected to their assessments of teaching quality? A controlled study in screen-based and immersive video environments

Teaching quality is commonly assessed through classroom observation. However, observer ratings of teaching quality frequently exhibit limited psychometric quality. Beyond evaluating the ratings themselves, exploring the observation process and the design of the video environment may offer valuable insights into conditions that enhance rating accuracy. This study explored the classroom observation process of preservice teachers using eye-tracking technology and examined how their gaze behavior relates to the accuracy of their teaching-quality ratings. We also investigated the impact of different video environments by comparing traditional classroom videos presented on computer screens with immersive 360-degree classroom videos presented on virtual-reality headsets. N = 75 preservice teachers participated in a controlled lab study. Each participant observed two randomly assigned mathematics classroom videos—one in a traditional screen-based and one in an immersive video environment. Eye trackers recorded gaze behavior during critical classroom events. Participants rated the quality of the observed teaching after the video observations. Overall, observers adjusted their gaze according to the focus of critical events (teacher- or student-focused). In immersive 360-degree videos, they showed a stronger visual focus on the teacher. Both visual focus of attention and cognitive arousal during critical events, indicated by a larger pupil diameter, predicted the accuracy of teaching-quality ratings, with gaze being a stronger predictor of rating accuracy in immersive compared to screen-based videos. The findings indicate that gaze behavior offers actionable insights into classroom observation processes and informs the design of observation environments in both research and teacher education. • We used eye-tracking to examine visual attention and cognitive arousal during classroom observations. • Preservice teachers showed different visual attention patterns for different types of critical classroom events. • Preservice teachers' gaze behavior was predictive for how accurately they assessed teaching quality. • Gaze–accuracy links were stronger for classroom observations in immersive 360-degree videos. • Preservice teachers observed teaching differently depending on their subject-specific background.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Instruction
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102260
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How is preservice teachers’ gaze during classroom observation connected to their assessments of teaching quality? A controlled study in screen-based and immersive video environments

Marita Friesen, Tobias Appel, Benjamin Fauth, Anika Dreher et al.
Learning and Instruction
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

How is preservice teachers’ gaze during classroom observation connected to their assessments of teaching quality? A controlled study in screen-based and immersive video environments

Marita Friesen, Tobias Appel, Benjamin Fauth, Anika Dreher, Philipp Stark, Liz Hansen, Birgit Brucker, Richard Göllner, Ulrich Trautwein, Peter Gerjets, Tosca Daltoè
article en

Abstract

Teaching quality is commonly assessed through classroom observation. However, observer ratings of teaching quality frequently exhibit limited psychometric quality. Beyond evaluating the ratings themselves, exploring the observation process and the design of the video environment may offer valuable insights into conditions that enhance rating accuracy. This study explored the classroom observation process of preservice teachers using eye-tracking technology and examined how their gaze behavior relates to the accuracy of their teaching-quality ratings. We also investigated the impact of different video environments by comparing traditional classroom videos presented on computer screens with immersive 360-degree classroom videos presented on virtual-reality headsets. N = 75 preservice teachers participated in a controlled lab study. Each participant observed two randomly assigned mathematics classroom videos—one in a traditional screen-based and one in an immersive video environment. Eye trackers recorded gaze behavior during critical classroom events. Participants rated the quality of the observed teaching after the video observations. Overall, observers adjusted their gaze according to the focus of critical events (teacher- or student-focused). In immersive 360-degree videos, they showed a stronger visual focus on the teacher. Both visual focus of attention and cognitive arousal during critical events, indicated by a larger pupil diameter, predicted the accuracy of teaching-quality ratings, with gaze being a stronger predictor of rating accuracy in immersive compared to screen-based videos. The findings indicate that gaze behavior offers actionable insights into classroom observation processes and informs the design of observation environments in both research and teacher education. • We used eye-tracking to examine visual attention and cognitive arousal during classroom observations. • Preservice teachers showed different visual attention patterns for different types of critical classroom events. • Preservice teachers' gaze behavior was predictive for how accurately they assessed teaching quality. • Gaze–accuracy links were stronger for classroom observations in immersive 360-degree videos. • Preservice teachers observed teaching differently depending on their subject-specific background.

Learning and InstructionVol. 101
University of Potsdam (DE), Educational Research Institute (PL), Heidelberg University of Education (DE), University of Education Freiburg (DE), Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.