Impact of the Combination of Remimazolam and Volatile Anesthetics on Circulatory Dynamics in Free-Flap Reconstruction Surgery for Oral Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison With Desflurane and Sevoflurane

Background Patients who undergo free-flap reconstruction surgery for oral cancer are often elderly and require prolonged surgical procedures, making intraoperative circulatory management critical. We investigated the suitability of combining remimazolam besylate (remimazolam), which has minimal circulatory depressant effects, with inhalational anesthetics for maintenance anesthesia in comparison to maintenance using inhalational anesthetics alone. Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent oral tumor resection, neck dissection, and free-flap reconstruction surgery at a single institution between October 1, 2020, and April 30, 2022. Patients were divided into the following three groups according to anesthetic use: remimazolam and desflurane combination (Des+R), desflurane monotherapy (Des), and sevoflurane monotherapy (Sevo). Vital signs, vasopressor use, blood loss, and presence or absence of flap complications requiring reoperation were compared. Results Data from 47 patients (Des+R, n = 14; Des, n = 18; Sevo, n = 15) were analyzed. The mean arterial pressure in Des+R was significantly higher than in Des before reconstruction and higher than in both Des and Sevo during vascular anastomosis. Continuous vasopressor use was significantly less frequent in the Des+R group (pre-reconstruction: 21% vs. 77% and 60%, p = 0.006; vascular anastomosis: 28% vs. 72% and 66%, p = 0.04). Ephedrine use was greater in the Des group (p = 0.02), while phenylephrine use did not differ (p = 0.8). Blood loss was greater in Des+R than in Sevo (p = 0.04). Reoperations due to flap complications (thrombosis, hematoma, necrosis) were performed in Des+R (two patients, three times), Des (three patients, three times), and Sevo (three patients, five times). Conclusions In free-flap reconstruction surgery for oral cancer, the combination of desflurane and remimazolam anesthesia maintained higher blood pressure and stable hemodynamics while reducing vasopressor requirements. Given the small sample size and retrospective design, no definitive conclusions about superiority can be drawn. Well-designed prospective studies with standardized vasopressor protocols and assessment of postoperative flap complications are needed to further evaluate the suitability of this combination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96877
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the Combination of Remimazolam and Volatile Anesthetics on Circulatory Dynamics in Free-Flap Reconstruction Surgery for Oral Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison With Desflurane and Sevoflurane

Akira Kitamura, Hideyuki Nakagawa, Yoko Sasaki
Cureus
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Impact of the Combination of Remimazolam and Volatile Anesthetics on Circulatory Dynamics in Free-Flap Reconstruction Surgery for Oral Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison With Desflurane and Sevoflurane

Akira Kitamura, Hideyuki Nakagawa, Yoko Sasaki
article en

Abstract

Background Patients who undergo free-flap reconstruction surgery for oral cancer are often elderly and require prolonged surgical procedures, making intraoperative circulatory management critical. We investigated the suitability of combining remimazolam besylate (remimazolam), which has minimal circulatory depressant effects, with inhalational anesthetics for maintenance anesthesia in comparison to maintenance using inhalational anesthetics alone. Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent oral tumor resection, neck dissection, and free-flap reconstruction surgery at a single institution between October 1, 2020, and April 30, 2022. Patients were divided into the following three groups according to anesthetic use: remimazolam and desflurane combination (Des+R), desflurane monotherapy (Des), and sevoflurane monotherapy (Sevo). Vital signs, vasopressor use, blood loss, and presence or absence of flap complications requiring reoperation were compared. Results Data from 47 patients (Des+R, n = 14; Des, n = 18; Sevo, n = 15) were analyzed. The mean arterial pressure in Des+R was significantly higher than in Des before reconstruction and higher than in both Des and Sevo during vascular anastomosis. Continuous vasopressor use was significantly less frequent in the Des+R group (pre-reconstruction: 21% vs. 77% and 60%, p = 0.006; vascular anastomosis: 28% vs. 72% and 66%, p = 0.04). Ephedrine use was greater in the Des group (p = 0.02), while phenylephrine use did not differ (p = 0.8). Blood loss was greater in Des+R than in Sevo (p = 0.04). Reoperations due to flap complications (thrombosis, hematoma, necrosis) were performed in Des+R (two patients, three times), Des (three patients, three times), and Sevo (three patients, five times). Conclusions In free-flap reconstruction surgery for oral cancer, the combination of desflurane and remimazolam anesthesia maintained higher blood pressure and stable hemodynamics while reducing vasopressor requirements. Given the small sample size and retrospective design, no definitive conclusions about superiority can be drawn. Well-designed prospective studies with standardized vasopressor protocols and assessment of postoperative flap complications are needed to further evaluate the suitability of this combination.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Saitama International Medical Center (JP), Social Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital (JP), Saitama University (JP), Saitama Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.