A Comparative Analysis of Models for Real-Time Personal Protective Equipment Detection on Edge Devices

The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential to improve workplace safety. Despite specific regulations requiring the use of PPE, workers often neglect to wear it due to factors such as inattention, urgency, or convenience. Monitoring the correct use of PPE is especially critical in high-risk tasks. Computer vision technology can automate this process, leveraging deep neural models. This study investigates the performance of modern object detection models in identifying the correct use of PPE, focusing on their accuracy and execution speed. Specifically, the YOLOv11 and RT-DERT models are employed, trained on a real-world PPE dataset. Deployment on low-cost hardware, specifically an NVIDIA Jetson Nano, is evaluated using three deployment frameworks, namely PyTorch, OpenVINO, and TensorRT. The results show that YOLOv11n, with 2.6 million parameters, provides slightly lower average accuracy than more complex models. It stands out for its speed, reaching performances of 6.6 Frames Per Second (FPS) with PyTorch, 2.3 FPS with OpenVINO, and 10.6 FPS with TensorRT. On the other hand, YOLOv11l and YOLOv11x with, respectively, 46.5 and 86.7 million parameters offer higher accuracy, especially evident in small class identification, where simpler models tend to struggle. However, they show lower throughput, with 1.2 and 0.7 FPS on PyTorch. RT-DETR has competitive accuracy but lower performance on edge devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11227764
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Models for Real-Time Personal Protective Equipment Detection on Edge Devices

Francesco Di Rienzo, Pietro Ducange, Francesco Marcelloni, Carlo Vallati et al.
1 citations
Advanced Neural Network Applications
1.28
article

A Comparative Analysis of Models for Real-Time Personal Protective Equipment Detection on Edge Devices

Francesco Di Rienzo, Pietro Ducange, Francesco Marcelloni, Carlo Vallati, Giustino Claudio Miglionico
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential to improve workplace safety. Despite specific regulations requiring the use of PPE, workers often neglect to wear it due to factors such as inattention, urgency, or convenience. Monitoring the correct use of PPE is especially critical in high-risk tasks. Computer vision technology can automate this process, leveraging deep neural models. This study investigates the performance of modern object detection models in identifying the correct use of PPE, focusing on their accuracy and execution speed. Specifically, the YOLOv11 and RT-DERT models are employed, trained on a real-world PPE dataset. Deployment on low-cost hardware, specifically an NVIDIA Jetson Nano, is evaluated using three deployment frameworks, namely PyTorch, OpenVINO, and TensorRT. The results show that YOLOv11n, with 2.6 million parameters, provides slightly lower average accuracy than more complex models. It stands out for its speed, reaching performances of 6.6 Frames Per Second (FPS) with PyTorch, 2.3 FPS with OpenVINO, and 10.6 FPS with TensorRT. On the other hand, YOLOv11l and YOLOv11x with, respectively, 46.5 and 86.7 million parameters offer higher accuracy, especially evident in small class identification, where simpler models tend to struggle. However, they show lower throughput, with 1.2 and 0.7 FPS on PyTorch. RT-DETR has competitive accuracy but lower performance on edge devices.

University of Pisa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Neural Network Applications
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.