Comparison of Collagen Dressing Versus Conventional (Paraffin/Cotton Gauze) for Donor Site Dressing in Split Skin Graft Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction Effective management of donor site wounds following split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is crucial for optimal recovery, patient comfort, and prevention of complications. Conventional dressings are often associated with delayed healing, increased pain, and higher infection risk. Collagen dressings possess biological properties that may affect the healing process; however, their clinical advantages over conventional dressings remain to be fully established. Methods A prospective observational clinical study was conducted over 18 months (April 2023 - October 2024) at the Department of General Surgery, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital. A total of 60 patients undergoing STSG were divided into two groups (n=30 each): one receiving a conventional dressing (paraffin or cotton gauze) and the other a collagen dressing. Wound healing was assessed on postoperative days (PODs) 12, 14, 16, 18, and 22. Pain was evaluated daily for one week using the visual analogue scale (VAS), and other metrics like analgesic usage, infection rates, and patient satisfaction were recorded. Data were analyzed using chi-square and t-tests, with significance set at p<0.01. Results The collagen group showed a significantly shorter mean healing time (13.5 ± 1.9 days) compared to the conventional group (16.8 ± 2.1 days, p<0.001). Pain scores were consistently lower in the collagen group (Day 3 VAS: 3.8 vs. 5.9, p<0.001). Infection occurred in one patient (3.3%) in the collagen group versus five patients (16.7%) in the conventional group (p=0.043). Opioid use was notably less in the collagen group (13.3% vs. 33.3%, p=0.048), and patient satisfaction was significantly higher (very satisfied: 46.7% vs. 13.3%, p=0.008). Conclusion Collagen-based dressings demonstrated superior performance over conventional dressings (paraffin/cotton gauze) in terms of faster healing, better pain control, reduced infection rates, and higher patient satisfaction. Collagen dressings should be considered a preferred option for donor site management following STSG, particularly where enhanced recovery and patient comfort are priorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96890
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Collagen Dressing Versus Conventional (Paraffin/Cotton Gauze) for Donor Site Dressing in Split Skin Graft Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Karthikeyan Selvaraj, Santosh Balakrishnan, Raghavendra Chintha
Cureus
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Comparison of Collagen Dressing Versus Conventional (Paraffin/Cotton Gauze) for Donor Site Dressing in Split Skin Graft Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Karthikeyan Selvaraj, Santosh Balakrishnan, Raghavendra Chintha
article en

Abstract

Introduction Effective management of donor site wounds following split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is crucial for optimal recovery, patient comfort, and prevention of complications. Conventional dressings are often associated with delayed healing, increased pain, and higher infection risk. Collagen dressings possess biological properties that may affect the healing process; however, their clinical advantages over conventional dressings remain to be fully established. Methods A prospective observational clinical study was conducted over 18 months (April 2023 - October 2024) at the Department of General Surgery, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital. A total of 60 patients undergoing STSG were divided into two groups (n=30 each): one receiving a conventional dressing (paraffin or cotton gauze) and the other a collagen dressing. Wound healing was assessed on postoperative days (PODs) 12, 14, 16, 18, and 22. Pain was evaluated daily for one week using the visual analogue scale (VAS), and other metrics like analgesic usage, infection rates, and patient satisfaction were recorded. Data were analyzed using chi-square and t-tests, with significance set at p<0.01. Results The collagen group showed a significantly shorter mean healing time (13.5 ± 1.9 days) compared to the conventional group (16.8 ± 2.1 days, p<0.001). Pain scores were consistently lower in the collagen group (Day 3 VAS: 3.8 vs. 5.9, p<0.001). Infection occurred in one patient (3.3%) in the collagen group versus five patients (16.7%) in the conventional group (p=0.043). Opioid use was notably less in the collagen group (13.3% vs. 33.3%, p=0.048), and patient satisfaction was significantly higher (very satisfied: 46.7% vs. 13.3%, p=0.008). Conclusion Collagen-based dressings demonstrated superior performance over conventional dressings (paraffin/cotton gauze) in terms of faster healing, better pain control, reduced infection rates, and higher patient satisfaction. Collagen dressings should be considered a preferred option for donor site management following STSG, particularly where enhanced recovery and patient comfort are priorities.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.