Assessing Public Support of Gunshot Detection Technology Through a Framing Survey Experiment

Gunshot detection technology (“GDT”) is proliferating across law enforcement agencies, yet little is known about public support of GDT and whether various messages about GDT can sway public support. The present study reports findings from a pre-registered survey experiment ( N = 2,412) randomly assigning respondents to one of the three following conditions: (1) GDT effectiveness, (2) GDT stigma, or (3) the control condition. Those assigned the GDT effectiveness treatment were significantly more likely to support GDT, whereas the GDT stigma treatment did not sway public approval of GDT. There were non-significant heterogeneity tests across non-White and recent crime victims. Police agencies adopting GDT should transparently disseminate successes of GDT effectiveness within their jurisdiction, while addressing potential community concerns of the technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crime & Delinquency
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287251384656
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Public Support of Gunshot Detection Technology Through a Framing Survey Experiment

Brandon Tregle, Hunter M. Boehme, Kaley Smith, Gabrielle Mascari
1 citations
Crime & Delinquency
Deception detection and forensic psychology
2.44
article

Assessing Public Support of Gunshot Detection Technology Through a Framing Survey Experiment

Brandon Tregle, Hunter M. Boehme, Kaley Smith, Gabrielle Mascari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Gunshot detection technology (“GDT”) is proliferating across law enforcement agencies, yet little is known about public support of GDT and whether various messages about GDT can sway public support. The present study reports findings from a pre-registered survey experiment ( N = 2,412) randomly assigning respondents to one of the three following conditions: (1) GDT effectiveness, (2) GDT stigma, or (3) the control condition. Those assigned the GDT effectiveness treatment were significantly more likely to support GDT, whereas the GDT stigma treatment did not sway public approval of GDT. There were non-significant heterogeneity tests across non-White and recent crime victims. Police agencies adopting GDT should transparently disseminate successes of GDT effectiveness within their jurisdiction, while addressing potential community concerns of the technology.

Crime & Delinquency
University of South Carolina (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.