Analysis of independent Xgamma competing risks model using improved adaptive progressive censoring plan with cancer and radiology applications

In practical survival investigations, researchers frequently encounter failure observations attributable to diverse causes of failure, which substantially influence the statistical estimation of both survival and failure rate functions. The failure data collected in such scenarios are formally known in the literature as competing risk data. This framework complicates statistical inference, as traditional methods must account for latent failure times. This study investigates the independent competing risks model with two distinct failure causes when time-to-event data are modeled using the Xgamma distribution under an improved adaptive progressive Type-II censoring scheme. The focus is on estimating the distribution parameters, as well as the survival and failure rate functions. Both frequentist and Bayesian inferential frameworks are applied to derive point estimates and construct confidence or credible intervals for the parameters and the two survival metrics. The Bayesian estimates are obtained using the squared error loss function and the computational technique of Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. The statistical performance of the proposed methods is assessed via simulation experiments. To empirically validate the competing risks model with the Xgamma distribution, two real-world datasets with competing failure modes are analyzed, demonstrating its applicability for survival estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2025.102069
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of independent Xgamma competing risks model using improved adaptive progressive censoring plan with cancer and radiology applications

Ahmed Elshahhat, Mazen Mohammed Nassar, Maysaa Elmahi Abd Elwahab, Ohud A. Alqasem
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Analysis of independent Xgamma competing risks model using improved adaptive progressive censoring plan with cancer and radiology applications

Ahmed Elshahhat, Mazen Mohammed Nassar, Maysaa Elmahi Abd Elwahab, Ohud A. Alqasem
article en

Abstract

In practical survival investigations, researchers frequently encounter failure observations attributable to diverse causes of failure, which substantially influence the statistical estimation of both survival and failure rate functions. The failure data collected in such scenarios are formally known in the literature as competing risk data. This framework complicates statistical inference, as traditional methods must account for latent failure times. This study investigates the independent competing risks model with two distinct failure causes when time-to-event data are modeled using the Xgamma distribution under an improved adaptive progressive Type-II censoring scheme. The focus is on estimating the distribution parameters, as well as the survival and failure rate functions. Both frequentist and Bayesian inferential frameworks are applied to derive point estimates and construct confidence or credible intervals for the parameters and the two survival metrics. The Bayesian estimates are obtained using the squared error loss function and the computational technique of Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. The statistical performance of the proposed methods is assessed via simulation experiments. To empirically validate the competing risks model with the Xgamma distribution, two real-world datasets with competing failure modes are analyzed, demonstrating its applicability for survival estimation.

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesVol. 18(4)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Zagazig University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.