Humerus Brace for Treating Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Union and Failure Rates

Background Non-operative management of humeral shaft fractures, which is a common challenging upper limb injury, using a functional brace, remains widely practiced. However, modern reported outcomes vary, and actual union rates may differ from the historic benchmarks. Objective To evaluate the union rate and overall success of humeral shaft fractures treated conservatively in a functional brace, and to analyse how fracture level and pattern may influence outcomes. Methods This retrospective audit included adult patients with closed humeral shaft fractures managed in a functional brace between January 2012 and January 2019. The study was conducted at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, including two major teaching hospitals, and was registered under the institutional clinical governance system (Audit Code: CARMS-19262). Data were obtained from orthotics records across both sites. Demographics, fracture characteristics, complications, and outcomes were analysed. Failure was defined as surgical fixation for malalignment or non-union, or persistence of non-union at final follow-up. Results Eighty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 61.8 years, 58% female). Union was achieved in 78.4% of cases, and the overall success rate, defined as union without subsequent surgery, was 67 %. Conversely, 33% of patients (n=29) failed brace treatment, with 25% (n=22) ultimately requiring surgical fixation. Proximal and mid-shaft fractures showed higher rates of delayed or non-union compared with distal shaft fractures. Fracture pattern (transverse, oblique, spiral, comminuted) did not significantly influence union or failure. Conclusion Functional bracing achieved a modest union rate compared with historical data. Fracture level, particularly proximal and mid-shaft involvement, was associated with a significantly higher rate of non-union. Future studies should assess the influence of patient compliance, initial alignment, and brace fit on union potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96897
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Humerus Brace for Treating Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Union and Failure Rates

Omer Zubair, Serajdin Ajnin, Mahmoud Mersal, Sura O. Yousif et al.
Cureus
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Humerus Brace for Treating Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Union and Failure Rates

Omer Zubair, Serajdin Ajnin, Mahmoud Mersal, Sura O. Yousif, Mohamed Elgendy, S Salama, Osama Embaby, Abdelrahman Embabi
article en

Abstract

Background Non-operative management of humeral shaft fractures, which is a common challenging upper limb injury, using a functional brace, remains widely practiced. However, modern reported outcomes vary, and actual union rates may differ from the historic benchmarks. Objective To evaluate the union rate and overall success of humeral shaft fractures treated conservatively in a functional brace, and to analyse how fracture level and pattern may influence outcomes. Methods This retrospective audit included adult patients with closed humeral shaft fractures managed in a functional brace between January 2012 and January 2019. The study was conducted at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, including two major teaching hospitals, and was registered under the institutional clinical governance system (Audit Code: CARMS-19262). Data were obtained from orthotics records across both sites. Demographics, fracture characteristics, complications, and outcomes were analysed. Failure was defined as surgical fixation for malalignment or non-union, or persistence of non-union at final follow-up. Results Eighty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 61.8 years, 58% female). Union was achieved in 78.4% of cases, and the overall success rate, defined as union without subsequent surgery, was 67 %. Conversely, 33% of patients (n=29) failed brace treatment, with 25% (n=22) ultimately requiring surgical fixation. Proximal and mid-shaft fractures showed higher rates of delayed or non-union compared with distal shaft fractures. Fracture pattern (transverse, oblique, spiral, comminuted) did not significantly influence union or failure. Conclusion Functional bracing achieved a modest union rate compared with historical data. Fracture level, particularly proximal and mid-shaft involvement, was associated with a significantly higher rate of non-union. Future studies should assess the influence of patient compliance, initial alignment, and brace fit on union potential.

CureusVol. 17(11)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Farooq Hospital (PK), Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.