Numerical Analysis of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance With a Lung Serpentine Flow Field

ABSTRACT Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) are regarded as the best clean energy conversion technology because of their smaller number of emissions and higher efficiency. This numerical investigation used two different flow channel designs—the serpentine flow field (SFF) and the lung serpentine flow field (LSFF)—with active areas of 5 by 5 cm. The simulations are performed to determine a number of important factors, such as mass fraction, liquid water activity, temperature distribution, pressure drop, current flow density and membrane water content. The comparisons between the two flow channel designs were made. Based on the data, it can be concluded that the lung serpentine design outperforms its serpentine channel. Increased reactant utilization within the cell, which results in greater electrochemical performance, is suggested by the higher current density shown in the lung serpentine design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.70134
Primary Topic
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Analysis of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance With a Lung Serpentine Flow Field

Venkateswarlu Velisala, Muralikrishna Boni, B Surya, Amarnath Gundalabhagavan
Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
article

Numerical Analysis of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance With a Lung Serpentine Flow Field

Venkateswarlu Velisala, Muralikrishna Boni, B Surya, Amarnath Gundalabhagavan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) are regarded as the best clean energy conversion technology because of their smaller number of emissions and higher efficiency. This numerical investigation used two different flow channel designs—the serpentine flow field (SFF) and the lung serpentine flow field (LSFF)—with active areas of 5 by 5 cm. The simulations are performed to determine a number of important factors, such as mass fraction, liquid water activity, temperature distribution, pressure drop, current flow density and membrane water content. The comparisons between the two flow channel designs were made. Based on the data, it can be concluded that the lung serpentine design outperforms its serpentine channel. Increased reactant utilization within the cell, which results in greater electrochemical performance, is suggested by the higher current density shown in the lung serpentine design.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical EngineeringVol. 21(1)
National Institute of Technology Warangal (IN), Government of Andhra Pradesh (IN), Maharaj Vijayaram Gajapathi Raj College of Engineering (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.