Recognising and Realising the Field of Systems Research in Itself and for Itself: The 2026 Agenda for the Cybersystemic Community

ABSTRACT Systems thinking emerged as a transdisciplinary movement that sought to bridge the sciences, humanities and practices of change. Today, it spans many fields but risks losing coherence as its core ideas are repeatedly rediscovered and reapplied without deepening their theoretical roots. This paper draws on the experiences of the cybersystemic community under the roof of the International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR) and a scoping review of three journals: Systems Research and Behavioural Science , Systems Practice and Action Research and the Journal of Awareness‐Based Systems Change . It maps 10 clusters of contemporary systems research that emerged from 2020 to 2025. The analysis reveals wide application yet limited synthesis, suggesting that while the field is vibrant, it struggles to integrate its philosophical foundations. Using Jürgen Renn's concept of epistemic networks, the paper reinterprets systems research as a living ecology of ontological, epistemological and axiological commitments. Rather than seeking unity through control, the next phase of the field can nurture coherence through relationship, recognising and realising the field of systems research in and for itself. The IFSR 2026 agenda explores the conditions for the possibility of cultivating shared spaces of learning, encouraging plural ways of knowing, and regenerating the epistemic commons that sustain systems inquiry as a dynamic, reflective and life‐affirming practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3219
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognising and Realising the Field of Systems Research in Itself and for Itself: The 2026 Agenda for the Cybersystemic Community

Louis Klein, Rika Preiser, Pamela Buckle, Nam C. Nguyen et al.
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

Recognising and Realising the Field of Systems Research in Itself and for Itself: The 2026 Agenda for the Cybersystemic Community

Louis Klein, Rika Preiser, Pamela Buckle, Nam C. Nguyen, Ray Ison, Philippe Vandenbroeck
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Systems thinking emerged as a transdisciplinary movement that sought to bridge the sciences, humanities and practices of change. Today, it spans many fields but risks losing coherence as its core ideas are repeatedly rediscovered and reapplied without deepening their theoretical roots. This paper draws on the experiences of the cybersystemic community under the roof of the International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR) and a scoping review of three journals: Systems Research and Behavioural Science , Systems Practice and Action Research and the Journal of Awareness‐Based Systems Change . It maps 10 clusters of contemporary systems research that emerged from 2020 to 2025. The analysis reveals wide application yet limited synthesis, suggesting that while the field is vibrant, it struggles to integrate its philosophical foundations. Using Jürgen Renn's concept of epistemic networks, the paper reinterprets systems research as a living ecology of ontological, epistemological and axiological commitments. Rather than seeking unity through control, the next phase of the field can nurture coherence through relationship, recognising and realising the field of systems research in and for itself. The IFSR 2026 agenda explores the conditions for the possibility of cultivating shared spaces of learning, encouraging plural ways of knowing, and regenerating the epistemic commons that sustain systems inquiry as a dynamic, reflective and life‐affirming practice.

Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Oral Roberts University (US), The Open University (GB), Hertie School (DE), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Shift (United Kingdom) (GB), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.