Perioperative Glycaemic Control and Orthopaedic Outcomes: A Narrative Review of Evidence and Future Directions

In orthopaedic surgery, diabetes mellitus (DM) is consistently associated with delayed fracture healing, non-union, implant failure, periprosthetic joint infection, and poorer postoperative recovery. Although strict perioperative glycaemic control has been shown to improve outcomes in general surgical populations, current national thresholds are largely extrapolated from non-orthopaedic data and focus primarily on cardiovascular and soft-tissue complications rather than bone biology. Existing recommendations from national guidelines vary and remain non-specific to orthopaedics. No consensus exists on optimal perioperative glucose or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) targets for elective orthopaedic interventions. This review evaluates current evidence linking perioperative glycaemic status to orthopaedic outcomes. Relevant literature, particularly focused on total joint arthroplasty (TJA), was identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar. Evidence reviewed in this article suggests that perioperative hyperglycaemia, rather than HbA1c alone, is a stronger predictor of complications. Prospective studies are needed to assess preoperative HbA1c and perioperative glucose trajectories and their relationship with standardised outcomes. The potential harms of intensive control, such as hypoglycaemia and surgical delays, also require careful consideration. Additionally, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intensified versus standard glucose control protocols are required, with both efficacy and safety as endpoints. Defining evidence-based, orthopaedic-specific glycaemic thresholds is essential to reduce complications, enhance recovery, and improve long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96905
Primary Topic
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perioperative Glycaemic Control and Orthopaedic Outcomes: A Narrative Review of Evidence and Future Directions

Leonard C. Marcus, Ivanova Ip, David Mafullul, Harine Baalamurugan et al.
Cureus
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
article

Perioperative Glycaemic Control and Orthopaedic Outcomes: A Narrative Review of Evidence and Future Directions

Leonard C. Marcus, Ivanova Ip, David Mafullul, Harine Baalamurugan, Samson Arokiyanathan, Janthula Ranchagoda
article en

Abstract

In orthopaedic surgery, diabetes mellitus (DM) is consistently associated with delayed fracture healing, non-union, implant failure, periprosthetic joint infection, and poorer postoperative recovery. Although strict perioperative glycaemic control has been shown to improve outcomes in general surgical populations, current national thresholds are largely extrapolated from non-orthopaedic data and focus primarily on cardiovascular and soft-tissue complications rather than bone biology. Existing recommendations from national guidelines vary and remain non-specific to orthopaedics. No consensus exists on optimal perioperative glucose or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) targets for elective orthopaedic interventions. This review evaluates current evidence linking perioperative glycaemic status to orthopaedic outcomes. Relevant literature, particularly focused on total joint arthroplasty (TJA), was identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar. Evidence reviewed in this article suggests that perioperative hyperglycaemia, rather than HbA1c alone, is a stronger predictor of complications. Prospective studies are needed to assess preoperative HbA1c and perioperative glucose trajectories and their relationship with standardised outcomes. The potential harms of intensive control, such as hypoglycaemia and surgical delays, also require careful consideration. Additionally, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intensified versus standard glucose control protocols are required, with both efficacy and safety as endpoints. Defining evidence-based, orthopaedic-specific glycaemic thresholds is essential to reduce complications, enhance recovery, and improve long-term outcomes.

CureusVol. 17(11)
West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.