Who should act, when, and where? The SCOPE framework for establishing responsibility and legitimacy in digital citizenship

Abstract This article introduces the Scope of Civic Online Platform Engagement (SCOPE) framework to explain how users interpret and negotiate civic action on social media. It distinguishes between responsibility, which pertains to the obligation side of action (who should act) and legitimacy, which concerns who may act with authority and appropriateness. Building on affordance theory, boundary theory, and research on heuristics, SCOPE demonstrates how affordances shape the conditions for action. Users apply heuristics to interpret cues of visibility, relational ties, spatial mandates, and temporal urgency. These interpretations are then translated into boundary work, shaping responsibility and legitimacy judgments. To operationalize this process, the article proposes decision-making matrices that condense boundary judgments into simple two-question tests of when and by whom civic action is expected. The framework reorients the study of digital citizenship from abstract prescriptions of “good citizenship” to situated and recursive practices of boundary negotiation in platform environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Theory
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf029
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who should act, when, and where? The SCOPE framework for establishing responsibility and legitimacy in digital citizenship

Emilija Gagrčin
Communication Theory
Social Media and Politics
article

Who should act, when, and where? The SCOPE framework for establishing responsibility and legitimacy in digital citizenship

Emilija Gagrčin
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article introduces the Scope of Civic Online Platform Engagement (SCOPE) framework to explain how users interpret and negotiate civic action on social media. It distinguishes between responsibility, which pertains to the obligation side of action (who should act) and legitimacy, which concerns who may act with authority and appropriateness. Building on affordance theory, boundary theory, and research on heuristics, SCOPE demonstrates how affordances shape the conditions for action. Users apply heuristics to interpret cues of visibility, relational ties, spatial mandates, and temporal urgency. These interpretations are then translated into boundary work, shaping responsibility and legitimacy judgments. To operationalize this process, the article proposes decision-making matrices that condense boundary judgments into simple two-question tests of when and by whom civic action is expected. The framework reorients the study of digital citizenship from abstract prescriptions of “good citizenship” to situated and recursive practices of boundary negotiation in platform environments.

Communication Theory
Technische Hochschule Mannheim (DE), University of Mannheim (DE), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who should act, when, and where? The SCOPE framework for establishing responsibility and legitimacy in digital citizenship — Emilija Gagrčin · Communication Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS