A configurational study of innovation in the business and economic field

Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) has gained widespread popularity in social science research. However, incorporating the concept of growth—common in business and economic studies—into fsQCA remains unintuitive and methodologically challenging. This study proposes a new approach to systematically integrate growth into fsQCA applications. The method addresses three key challenges: the naming of antecedents and outcomes, the calibration of variables, and the interpretation of results. An empirical analysis demonstrates that the proposed approach offers a more generalized and robust framework for handling both positive and negative growth values. By applying the method, antecedents and outcomes are appropriately named and calibrated, and the resulting solutions are more interpretable and self-explanatory. Ultimately, the method enhances the clarity and accuracy of fsQCA outcomes, reducing the risk of misinterpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100883
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A configurational study of innovation in the business and economic field

Kun‐Huang Huarng, Tiffany Hui‐Kuang Yu
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

A configurational study of innovation in the business and economic field

Kun‐Huang Huarng, Tiffany Hui‐Kuang Yu
article en

Abstract

Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) has gained widespread popularity in social science research. However, incorporating the concept of growth—common in business and economic studies—into fsQCA remains unintuitive and methodologically challenging. This study proposes a new approach to systematically integrate growth into fsQCA applications. The method addresses three key challenges: the naming of antecedents and outcomes, the calibration of variables, and the interpretation of results. An empirical analysis demonstrates that the proposed approach offers a more generalized and robust framework for handling both positive and negative growth values. By applying the method, antecedents and outcomes are appropriately named and calibrated, and the resulting solutions are more interpretable and self-explanatory. Ultimately, the method enhances the clarity and accuracy of fsQCA outcomes, reducing the risk of misinterpretation.

Journal of Innovation & KnowledgeVol. 12
National Taipei University of Business (TW), Feng Chia University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.