No quick fixes: Multi-agency working to improve information-sharing on men and keep children safe

Abstract The failure of public agencies such as children’s social care (CSC), health and the police to share information about children and families has been repeatedly identified as a factor contributing to missed opportunities to protect children from harm in England. Specific failings relating to information on men in children’s lives who may pose a danger have also been highlighted, including in the Myth of the Invisible Men report published by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel. Successive governments have sought to address these failings by mandating the reform of local multi-agency governance structures and by seeking to influence day-to-day interactions between agencies including CSC, health, the police, schools and others with child safeguarding responsibilities. This article offers a critical perspective on the most recent reforms by drawing on previous research on the barriers and facilitators to information-sharing and findings from four case studies that examined local initiatives that have aimed to improve information-sharing. We identify three key themes that we argue need to be carefully considered in the design and implementation of multi-agency structures and working practices: (1) resources and organizational commitment to multi-agency working; (2) communication between professionals; and (3) competing perspectives on sharing information without consent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Social Work
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaf249
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No quick fixes: Multi-agency working to improve information-sharing on men and keep children safe

Nicole Steils, Carl Purcell, Mary Baginsky
The British Journal of Social Work
Children's Rights and Participation
article

No quick fixes: Multi-agency working to improve information-sharing on men and keep children safe

Nicole Steils, Carl Purcell, Mary Baginsky
article en

Abstract

Abstract The failure of public agencies such as children’s social care (CSC), health and the police to share information about children and families has been repeatedly identified as a factor contributing to missed opportunities to protect children from harm in England. Specific failings relating to information on men in children’s lives who may pose a danger have also been highlighted, including in the Myth of the Invisible Men report published by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel. Successive governments have sought to address these failings by mandating the reform of local multi-agency governance structures and by seeking to influence day-to-day interactions between agencies including CSC, health, the police, schools and others with child safeguarding responsibilities. This article offers a critical perspective on the most recent reforms by drawing on previous research on the barriers and facilitators to information-sharing and findings from four case studies that examined local initiatives that have aimed to improve information-sharing. We identify three key themes that we argue need to be carefully considered in the design and implementation of multi-agency structures and working practices: (1) resources and organizational commitment to multi-agency working; (2) communication between professionals; and (3) competing perspectives on sharing information without consent.

The British Journal of Social Work
King's College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Delivery Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Children's Rights and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.