Comparative Evaluation of Post-debond Enamel Loss of Ceramic Brackets Bonded with Antibacterial Monomer-containing Adhesive Bonding System and Conventional Adhesive Bonding System: An In Vitro Study

The Rs bromide adhesive system resulted in significantly less enamel surface roughness after debonding compared to conventional adhesive systems. Clearfil Protect SE can be considered a superior bonding agent for minimizing enamel loss post-debonding. How to cite this article: Saikia T, Baskaranarayana B, Anbarasu P, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Post-debond Enamel Loss of Ceramic Brackets Bonded with Antibacterial Monomer-containing Adhesive Bonding System and Conventional Adhesive Bonding Systems: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(10):965-969.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3961
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Post-debond Enamel Loss of Ceramic Brackets Bonded with Antibacterial Monomer-containing Adhesive Bonding System and Conventional Adhesive Bonding System: An In Vitro Study

SP Saravana Dinesh, Balashanmugam Baskaranarayanan, Shilpa Bhandi, Prema Anbarasu et al.
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Dental materials and restorations
article

Comparative Evaluation of Post-debond Enamel Loss of Ceramic Brackets Bonded with Antibacterial Monomer-containing Adhesive Bonding System and Conventional Adhesive Bonding System: An In Vitro Study

SP Saravana Dinesh, Balashanmugam Baskaranarayanan, Shilpa Bhandi, Prema Anbarasu, Mohit Gupta, Tribeni Saikia, Gabriel Eisenhuth, Sebastian Eisenhuth, Claudia Eisenhuth
article en

Abstract

The Rs bromide adhesive system resulted in significantly less enamel surface roughness after debonding compared to conventional adhesive systems. Clearfil Protect SE can be considered a superior bonding agent for minimizing enamel loss post-debonding. How to cite this article: Saikia T, Baskaranarayana B, Anbarasu P, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Post-debond Enamel Loss of Ceramic Brackets Bonded with Antibacterial Monomer-containing Adhesive Bonding System and Conventional Adhesive Bonding Systems: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(10):965-969.

The Journal of Contemporary Dental PracticeVol. 26(10)
New England College (US), Roseman University of Health Sciences (US), Chettinad Health City (IN), Tamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital (IN), Jacksonville University (US), Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences (IN), Assam Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.