Characterizing error types in the comprehension of fractions: The number line test

Understanding fractions is a major hurdle for many students. A key aspect of fraction comprehension is the ability to evaluate their numerical magnitude. Here, we use a number-to-line task, where students point to the location of a number on a graduated line, to characterize errors in fraction comprehension. A total of ∼ 26,000 French pupils from 6th to 10th grade were tested (U.S. equivalent grades). Error rates were high, almost 80 % in 6th grade and 45 % in 10th grade. Errors could be classified into seven dominant patterns, whose frequency varied by grade level and individual performance. Younger and lower-performing children mostly confused fractions with decimals. Older and higher-performing children often confused a fraction ab and its inverse ba. All grades also confused the roles of the numerator and the denominator. We propose a theoretical framework suggesting that errors arise as bugs in the execution of one of two main strategies: children converting the fraction into a decimal, or partitioning the line into units and counting them. This model explains the observed error patterns as stemming from inappropriate strategy selection, flawed execution, or incorrect corrective steps due to flawed execution. Our analysis provides a deeper understanding of the various traps that students face when interpreting a fraction's magnitude, the frequency of these errors, and their sequential order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106373
Primary Topic
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing error types in the comprehension of fractions: The number line test

Cassandra Potier Watkins, Chenxi He, Maxime Cauté, Stanislas Dehaene
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
article

Characterizing error types in the comprehension of fractions: The number line test

Cassandra Potier Watkins, Chenxi He, Maxime Cauté, Stanislas Dehaene
article en

Abstract

Understanding fractions is a major hurdle for many students. A key aspect of fraction comprehension is the ability to evaluate their numerical magnitude. Here, we use a number-to-line task, where students point to the location of a number on a graduated line, to characterize errors in fraction comprehension. A total of ∼ 26,000 French pupils from 6th to 10th grade were tested (U.S. equivalent grades). Error rates were high, almost 80 % in 6th grade and 45 % in 10th grade. Errors could be classified into seven dominant patterns, whose frequency varied by grade level and individual performance. Younger and lower-performing children mostly confused fractions with decimals. Older and higher-performing children often confused a fraction ab and its inverse ba. All grades also confused the roles of the numerator and the denominator. We propose a theoretical framework suggesting that errors arise as bugs in the execution of one of two main strategies: children converting the fraction into a decimal, or partitioning the line into units and counting them. This model explains the observed error patterns as stemming from inappropriate strategy selection, flawed execution, or incorrect corrective steps due to flawed execution. Our analysis provides a deeper understanding of the various traps that students face when interpreting a fraction's magnitude, the frequency of these errors, and their sequential order.

Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyVol. 263
Inserm (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Cognitive Neuroimaging Lab (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.