Removing the Drapes: Reflexive Insights on Research into Real-World Surgical Human-Robot Collaboration

Stepping beyond the security of controlled lab environments to study the complex realities of real-world interactive system use is a significant undertaking. Although ‘in-the-wild' approaches are widely used within HCI, they typically come at a cost, both literally, as they can be expensive to run, and metaphorically, as they give rise to new issues, such as ethical implications for participants. We present reflexive insights into conducting Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) research in real-world surgical environments, drawing on three studies of robotic-assisted surgeries that include video analysis, interviews, and in-theatre observations. We reflect on the ways we navigated ethics approvals, institutional gatekeeping, spatial and procedural constraints, and trust-building across various settings. The paper presents five lessons learned, outlining strategies for negotiating institutional access, conducting in-situ observations, adapting methods in restricted environments, and aligning expectations across stakeholders. These lessons extend conversations in HCI about the complexities of conducting qualitative research in clinical domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3764687.3769938
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Removing the Drapes: Reflexive Insights on Research into Real-World Surgical Human-Robot Collaboration

Jimmy Vermeulen, Stine S. Johansen, Alan Burden, James Dwyer
1 citations
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
2.44
article

Removing the Drapes: Reflexive Insights on Research into Real-World Surgical Human-Robot Collaboration

Jimmy Vermeulen, Stine S. Johansen, Alan Burden, James Dwyer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Stepping beyond the security of controlled lab environments to study the complex realities of real-world interactive system use is a significant undertaking. Although ‘in-the-wild' approaches are widely used within HCI, they typically come at a cost, both literally, as they can be expensive to run, and metaphorically, as they give rise to new issues, such as ethical implications for participants. We present reflexive insights into conducting Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) research in real-world surgical environments, drawing on three studies of robotic-assisted surgeries that include video analysis, interviews, and in-theatre observations. We reflect on the ways we navigated ethics approvals, institutional gatekeeping, spatial and procedural constraints, and trust-building across various settings. The paper presents five lessons learned, outlining strategies for negotiating institutional access, conducting in-situ observations, adapting methods in restricted environments, and aligning expectations across stakeholders. These lessons extend conversations in HCI about the complexities of conducting qualitative research in clinical domains.

Queensland University of Technology (AU), Australian e-Health Research Centre (AU), Aalborg University (DK), Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (AU)
Australian Government, ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Uniquely Australian Foods
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.