Development and Validation of Shoaib Sensorimotor Development Tool for Normal Pediatric Population

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns about developmental delays in babies were at their peak. During the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns about developmental delays in infants and young children increased substantially. However, culturally relevant, validated tools to assess sensorimotor development are scarce. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate the Shoaib Sensorimotor Development Tool (SSDT) to evaluate developmental milestones in typically developing children. Methods: This was a cross-sectional psychometric validation study. A comprehensive tool encompassing nine domains, gross motor, fine motor, sensory, tone, balance, gait, reflexes, social interaction, and speech, was developed to assess sensorimotor development holistically. A total of 150 mothers of typically developing children aged 3 to 7 years participated in the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), while 300 mothers were included in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In addition, the SSDT required an average of 21 ± 6.00 minutes to complete, with administration being feasible for trained therapists following a brief workshop. Data were analyzed using SPSS v26 and AMOS for factor analysis. Model fit was evaluated with regression weights and standard fit indices (p < 0.05). Results: The mean age of mothers who participated in this study was 36.16±4.73 years, and the mean age of children was 4.45±0.784 years. Of the 150 mothers (EFA) and 300 mothers (CFA) enrolled, 144 and 288 completed the full assessment, yielding a 96% completion rate. Dropouts were minimal, 6 and 12, respectively, and the reasons have been detailed in the methods. 75 constructs were analyzed using EFA and three were removed due to cross-loading, resulting in a significant Bartlett's test (p = 0.000) and a high Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of 0.992. The final 72 constructs of SSDT formed a single factor, sensorimotor development, with a cumulative variance of 84.317% and an eigenvalue of 3.897. Fit indices indicated good model fit (CFI = 0.983, GFI = 0.962, TLI = 0.989, SRMR = 0.0325, RMSEA = 0.076). The SSDT demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.963). Conclusion: SSDT is a promising tool for early sensorimotor assessment, offering clinical, educational, and research utility; however, broader validation and longitudinal studies are needed for its universal adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of King Edward Medical University
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v31i3.5888
Primary Topic
Infant Development and Preterm Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of Shoaib Sensorimotor Development Tool for Normal Pediatric Population

Ashfaq Ahmad, Juliana Barbosa Goulardins, Asif Hanif, Shoaib Waqas et al.
Annals of King Edward Medical University
Infant Development and Preterm Care
article

Development and Validation of Shoaib Sensorimotor Development Tool for Normal Pediatric Population

Ashfaq Ahmad, Juliana Barbosa Goulardins, Asif Hanif, Shoaib Waqas, Atiqa Niamat, Muhammad Tariq
article en

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns about developmental delays in babies were at their peak. During the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns about developmental delays in infants and young children increased substantially. However, culturally relevant, validated tools to assess sensorimotor development are scarce. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate the Shoaib Sensorimotor Development Tool (SSDT) to evaluate developmental milestones in typically developing children. Methods: This was a cross-sectional psychometric validation study. A comprehensive tool encompassing nine domains, gross motor, fine motor, sensory, tone, balance, gait, reflexes, social interaction, and speech, was developed to assess sensorimotor development holistically. A total of 150 mothers of typically developing children aged 3 to 7 years participated in the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), while 300 mothers were included in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In addition, the SSDT required an average of 21 ± 6.00 minutes to complete, with administration being feasible for trained therapists following a brief workshop. Data were analyzed using SPSS v26 and AMOS for factor analysis. Model fit was evaluated with regression weights and standard fit indices (p < 0.05). Results: The mean age of mothers who participated in this study was 36.16±4.73 years, and the mean age of children was 4.45±0.784 years. Of the 150 mothers (EFA) and 300 mothers (CFA) enrolled, 144 and 288 completed the full assessment, yielding a 96% completion rate. Dropouts were minimal, 6 and 12, respectively, and the reasons have been detailed in the methods. 75 constructs were analyzed using EFA and three were removed due to cross-loading, resulting in a significant Bartlett's test (p = 0.000) and a high Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of 0.992. The final 72 constructs of SSDT formed a single factor, sensorimotor development, with a cumulative variance of 84.317% and an eigenvalue of 3.897. Fit indices indicated good model fit (CFI = 0.983, GFI = 0.962, TLI = 0.989, SRMR = 0.0325, RMSEA = 0.076). The SSDT demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.963). Conclusion: SSDT is a promising tool for early sensorimotor assessment, offering clinical, educational, and research utility; however, broader validation and longitudinal studies are needed for its universal adoption.

Annals of King Edward Medical UniversityVol. 31(3)
Sakarya University (TR), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (BR), University of Lahore (PK), Lahore University of Management Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Infant Development and Preterm Care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.