Selective Versus Generalized Gender Bias in Childhood Health and Nutrition: Evidence from India

We use data from India's National Family Health Survey (conducted in 1992-93, 1998-99, and 2005-06) to study gender discrimination across India among children aged 0-35 months. We focus on four measures of parental investment: (1) immunization, (2) received medical treatment for acute respiratory infection (ARI), (3) breastfed beyond 17 months, and (4) severe stunting. We contrast <em>generalized discrimination</em> that affects all daughters (vs. sons) with selective <em>discrimination</em> that posits enhanced discrimination among daughters who have sisters. We test which form of discrimination dominates and whether their effects are reinforcing. The main finding from this study is consistent and straightforward: daughters face discrimination relative to sons regardless of sibling composition and at both low and high birth orders. Further, net of general discrimination against daughters, we find little evidence of selective gender discrimination by birth order or sibling composition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/h97z-1e09
Primary Topic
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selective Versus Generalized Gender Bias in Childhood Health and Nutrition: Evidence from India

S. Philip Morgan, Sowmya Rajan
UNC Libraries
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
article

Selective Versus Generalized Gender Bias in Childhood Health and Nutrition: Evidence from India

S. Philip Morgan, Sowmya Rajan
article en

Abstract

We use data from India's National Family Health Survey (conducted in 1992-93, 1998-99, and 2005-06) to study gender discrimination across India among children aged 0-35 months. We focus on four measures of parental investment: (1) immunization, (2) received medical treatment for acute respiratory infection (ARI), (3) breastfed beyond 17 months, and (4) severe stunting. We contrast <em>generalized discrimination</em> that affects all daughters (vs. sons) with selective <em>discrimination</em> that posits enhanced discrimination among daughters who have sisters. We test which form of discrimination dominates and whether their effects are reinforcing. The main finding from this study is consistent and straightforward: daughters face discrimination relative to sons regardless of sibling composition and at both low and high birth orders. Further, net of general discrimination against daughters, we find little evidence of selective gender discrimination by birth order or sibling composition.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Selective Versus Generalized Gender Bias in Childhood Health and Nutrition: Evidence from India — S. Philip Morgan, Sowmya Rajan · UNC Libraries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS