Making a good start: differential impacts of teaching methods for promoting motor performance and understanding among 6–7-year-old children in Kuwait

A good start and early success with motor skills are important features of primary education when promoting lifelong physical activity. Notably, however, empirical guidance on optimal teaching methods is limited, especially regarding gender differences. To address this, we compared early success across several teaching methods based on different skill acquisition approaches. Five groups of 14 Kuwaiti children (N = 70) practiced a bowling task under different teaching conditions, namely: Solo, Social learning, Demonstration, Questioning, and Verbal instruction. Performance outcome scores, questioning, and teacher observation were used to evaluate conditions' impact on participants’ immediate performance and understanding. ANOVA revealed significant effects for teaching method on outcome scores. Post-hoc analyses found verbal instruction yielded significantly better outcomes than solo and social learning methods. Analyses of near misses found significant differences for gender, with males outperforming females. Assessment of participants’ understanding revealed a higher level for males and those receiving verbal instruction compared with solo and social practice. Different teaching methods generate different practice outcomes and understanding levels in children. Offering more direct guidance can support desirable early developmental success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2588504
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making a good start: differential impacts of teaching methods for promoting motor performance and understanding among 6–7-year-old children in Kuwait

Howie J. Carson, Dave Collins, Norah N. Alali
Cogent Education
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

Making a good start: differential impacts of teaching methods for promoting motor performance and understanding among 6–7-year-old children in Kuwait

Howie J. Carson, Dave Collins, Norah N. Alali
article en

Abstract

A good start and early success with motor skills are important features of primary education when promoting lifelong physical activity. Notably, however, empirical guidance on optimal teaching methods is limited, especially regarding gender differences. To address this, we compared early success across several teaching methods based on different skill acquisition approaches. Five groups of 14 Kuwaiti children (N = 70) practiced a bowling task under different teaching conditions, namely: Solo, Social learning, Demonstration, Questioning, and Verbal instruction. Performance outcome scores, questioning, and teacher observation were used to evaluate conditions' impact on participants’ immediate performance and understanding. ANOVA revealed significant effects for teaching method on outcome scores. Post-hoc analyses found verbal instruction yielded significantly better outcomes than solo and social learning methods. Analyses of near misses found significant differences for gender, with males outperforming females. Assessment of participants’ understanding revealed a higher level for males and those receiving verbal instruction compared with solo and social practice. Different teaching methods generate different practice outcomes and understanding levels in children. Offering more direct guidance can support desirable early developmental success.

Cogent EducationVol. 12(1)
English Institute of Sport (GB), Dublin City University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.