Constraining a Tracer‐Aided Hydrological Model With Multi‐Objective Calibration and Young Water Fractions: Toward Improved Process‐Based Simulations

ABSTRACT Tracer‐aided hydrological models are powerful tools for revealing hydrological processes of a watershed of interest, but their performance is often limited by parameter uncertainty. This study aims to develop a transferable, process‐consistent parameter‐constraint framework by combining multi‐objective calibration strategies with observed young water fraction ( F obs ) constraints within the Two‐Reservoir StorAge Selection (TRSAS) model. The model was applied to a humid hilly watershed in southern China to assess how weighting different observational targets (i.e., discharge, streamflow δ 18 O, soil water δ 18 O, and groundwater δ 18 O) affects model performance and parameter identifiability. Calibrating solely to discharge yielded optimal discharge simulations but poor reproduction of streamflow δ 18 O, whereas prioritising streamflow δ 18 O led to consistently strong performance across variables (NSE > 0.70), except for groundwater δ 18 O (NSE < 0.55). The best‐performing scenario assigned the highest weights to discharge (0.4) and streamflow δ 18 O (0.3), achieving NSE values of 0.76 and 0.66 for the calibration and validation periods, respectively. Streamflow δ 18 O was especially effective in constraining both flow and transport module parameters, while soil and groundwater δ 18 O provided limited or localised constraint. Groundwater storage parameters remained poorly identifiable across all calibration strategies. In addition, incorporating F obs did not significantly improve performance metrics but enhanced internal consistency, such as simulated young water fraction ( F sim ) and runoff source apportionment. Overall, the proposed calibration–constraint framework strengthens the process realism and diagnostic capability of tracer‐aided hydrological models and shows strong potential for application in other humid watersheds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70326
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraining a Tracer‐Aided Hydrological Model With Multi‐Objective Calibration and Young Water Fractions: Toward Improved Process‐Based Simulations

Simin Qu, Xiaoqiang Yang, Chong Wei, Peng Shi et al.
Hydrological Processes
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Constraining a Tracer‐Aided Hydrological Model With Multi‐Objective Calibration and Young Water Fractions: Toward Improved Process‐Based Simulations

Simin Qu, Xiaoqiang Yang, Chong Wei, Peng Shi, Hai Yang, Jianfeng Gou, Chenxi Liu, Jintao Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tracer‐aided hydrological models are powerful tools for revealing hydrological processes of a watershed of interest, but their performance is often limited by parameter uncertainty. This study aims to develop a transferable, process‐consistent parameter‐constraint framework by combining multi‐objective calibration strategies with observed young water fraction ( F obs ) constraints within the Two‐Reservoir StorAge Selection (TRSAS) model. The model was applied to a humid hilly watershed in southern China to assess how weighting different observational targets (i.e., discharge, streamflow δ 18 O, soil water δ 18 O, and groundwater δ 18 O) affects model performance and parameter identifiability. Calibrating solely to discharge yielded optimal discharge simulations but poor reproduction of streamflow δ 18 O, whereas prioritising streamflow δ 18 O led to consistently strong performance across variables (NSE > 0.70), except for groundwater δ 18 O (NSE < 0.55). The best‐performing scenario assigned the highest weights to discharge (0.4) and streamflow δ 18 O (0.3), achieving NSE values of 0.76 and 0.66 for the calibration and validation periods, respectively. Streamflow δ 18 O was especially effective in constraining both flow and transport module parameters, while soil and groundwater δ 18 O provided limited or localised constraint. Groundwater storage parameters remained poorly identifiable across all calibration strategies. In addition, incorporating F obs did not significantly improve performance metrics but enhanced internal consistency, such as simulated young water fraction ( F sim ) and runoff source apportionment. Overall, the proposed calibration–constraint framework strengthens the process realism and diagnostic capability of tracer‐aided hydrological models and shows strong potential for application in other humid watersheds.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 39(11)
China Three Gorges University (CN), Hohai University (CN), China Geological Survey (CN), Huaiyin Institute of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Geological Survey, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.