Reconstructing Perioperative Patient Education in Head and Neck Surgery

Patients undergoing extirpative oncologic and/or reconstructive head and neck surgery face complex postoperative milestones required for safe discharge. Through this quality improvement project, we evaluated our current practices in perioperative patient education and its impact on 30‐day metrics. In this baseline assessment, 15 patients (mean 66 years; 60% male; 80 white; 73% with 12th grade education or higher; 60% undergoing free flap reconstruction) who underwent extensive head and neck reconstruction at a tertiary care institution between August and December 2024 were surveyed. Most (93%) were satisfied with the timing of the information received but suggested additional visual aids and information about various recovery timelines. Preliminary findings from this ongoing quality improvement project reveal a need for more comprehensive perioperative education, particularly regarding support services and side‐effect management. In response, we have introduced procedure‐specific educational packets and preoperative phone calls to help patients better understand and navigate the recovery process. Level of Evidence: 4

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/jbmf-qa09
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstructing Perioperative Patient Education in Head and Neck Surgery

Victoria I. Fonseca, Makayla R. Matthews, Hamish Reid, Trevor Hackman
UNC Libraries
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Reconstructing Perioperative Patient Education in Head and Neck Surgery

Victoria I. Fonseca, Makayla R. Matthews, Hamish Reid, Trevor Hackman
article en

Abstract

Patients undergoing extirpative oncologic and/or reconstructive head and neck surgery face complex postoperative milestones required for safe discharge. Through this quality improvement project, we evaluated our current practices in perioperative patient education and its impact on 30‐day metrics. In this baseline assessment, 15 patients (mean 66 years; 60% male; 80 white; 73% with 12th grade education or higher; 60% undergoing free flap reconstruction) who underwent extensive head and neck reconstruction at a tertiary care institution between August and December 2024 were surveyed. Most (93%) were satisfied with the timing of the information received but suggested additional visual aids and information about various recovery timelines. Preliminary findings from this ongoing quality improvement project reveal a need for more comprehensive perioperative education, particularly regarding support services and side‐effect management. In response, we have introduced procedure‐specific educational packets and preoperative phone calls to help patients better understand and navigate the recovery process. Level of Evidence: 4

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reconstructing Perioperative Patient Education in Head and Neck Surgery — Victoria I. Fonseca, Makayla R. Matthews, et al. · UNC Libraries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS