Understanding Associations Between Patient‐Level Factors and Participation in a Breast Cancer Clinical Trial

Background Although breast cancer (BC) clinical trials offer novel treatments, participating patients often do not represent populations seen in clinics. This study assessed how patient sociodemographics, attitudes, and knowledge about clinical trials may be associated with participation. Methods This cross sectional analysis used survey data collected August–September 2021 by Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) and December 2022 by Patient Advocate Foundation (PAF) among women with a BC diagnosis. Respondents reported BC clinical trial participation, Attitudes Toward Cancer Trials Scale, clinical trial knowledge, diagnosis age, race, education level, household income, employment status, and BC stage. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted using Cramer's V or Cohen's d as effect sizes. Standardized total effects ( b Tot ) were estimated using a prespecified Structural Equation Model with 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 indicating weak, medium, and large magnitude, respectively. Results Of 612 respondents, 26% were Black, Indigenous, or a Person of Color, 44% < Bachelor's degree, and 48% had incomes < $50,000. Respondents who reported trial participation (18%) more often had positive attitudes toward trials (mean 94 of 126, SD 19.3 vs. 86, SD 15.5; d = 0.48) compared to those not reporting participation. Positive attitude was associated with trial participation for both survey cohorts (TBCRC: b Tot = 0.22, p = 0.0002; PAF: b Tot = 0.13, p = 0.01). Furthermore, clinical trial knowledge was associated with attitudes (TBCRC: b Tot = 0.27, p = < 0.0001; PAF: b Tot = 0.15, p = 0.003). Discussion Although we found that positive attitudes and high knowledge were associated with clinical trial participation, it is unknown if the trial itself directly affected this. However, trial enrollment may be increased and diversified via future interventions focused on promotion of positive attitudes toward clinical trials, potentially through increased trial education and knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/bywc-gf36
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Associations Between Patient‐Level Factors and Participation in a Breast Cancer Clinical Trial

Michelle Melisko, Antonio C. Wolff, Courtney Williams, Rebekah Angove et al.
UNC Libraries
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Understanding Associations Between Patient‐Level Factors and Participation in a Breast Cancer Clinical Trial

Michelle Melisko, Antonio C. Wolff, Courtney Williams, Rebekah Angove, Andrés Azuero, Kathleen D. Gallagher, Stephanie B. Wheeler, Emily B. Levitan, Eileen H. Shinn, Nicole E. Caston, Karen L. Smith, Russell Lee Griffin, Gabrielle Betty Rocque, Luqin Deng
article en

Abstract

Background Although breast cancer (BC) clinical trials offer novel treatments, participating patients often do not represent populations seen in clinics. This study assessed how patient sociodemographics, attitudes, and knowledge about clinical trials may be associated with participation. Methods This cross sectional analysis used survey data collected August–September 2021 by Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) and December 2022 by Patient Advocate Foundation (PAF) among women with a BC diagnosis. Respondents reported BC clinical trial participation, Attitudes Toward Cancer Trials Scale, clinical trial knowledge, diagnosis age, race, education level, household income, employment status, and BC stage. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted using Cramer's V or Cohen's d as effect sizes. Standardized total effects ( b Tot ) were estimated using a prespecified Structural Equation Model with 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 indicating weak, medium, and large magnitude, respectively. Results Of 612 respondents, 26% were Black, Indigenous, or a Person of Color, 44% < Bachelor's degree, and 48% had incomes < $50,000. Respondents who reported trial participation (18%) more often had positive attitudes toward trials (mean 94 of 126, SD 19.3 vs. 86, SD 15.5; d = 0.48) compared to those not reporting participation. Positive attitude was associated with trial participation for both survey cohorts (TBCRC: b Tot = 0.22, p = 0.0002; PAF: b Tot = 0.13, p = 0.01). Furthermore, clinical trial knowledge was associated with attitudes (TBCRC: b Tot = 0.27, p = < 0.0001; PAF: b Tot = 0.15, p = 0.003). Discussion Although we found that positive attitudes and high knowledge were associated with clinical trial participation, it is unknown if the trial itself directly affected this. However, trial enrollment may be increased and diversified via future interventions focused on promotion of positive attitudes toward clinical trials, potentially through increased trial education and knowledge.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.