Surgical management of pancreatic neck cancer: an ongoing dilemma

The surgical management of pancreatic neck adenocarcinoma (neck PDAC) ranges from extended pancreaticoduodenectomy (ePD) to subtotal left pancreatectomy (sLP) and total pancreatectomy, with no clear consensus on the optimal approach. This study aimed to compare ePD and sLP in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes. All patients who underwent ePD or sLP for neck PDAC were retrospectively reviewed and compared for perioperative and long-term outcomes. Forty-six patients were included: 18 (39.1%) underwent ePD and 28 (60.9%) sLP. ePD was associated with a higher rate of neoadjuvant treatment, longer operative time, and longer hospital stay. The most frequently involved lymph-node stations were #13-17 in the ePD group (44.4%) and #18 in the sLP group (42.9%). Overall survival (OS) was similar (p = 0.06), while disease-free survival (DFS) was longer in the sLP group (16 [9-22] vs 12 [5-18] months in the ePD group; p = 0.03). Due to the high rate of nodal metastases in station #13-17 and #18, both procedures may be inadequate as surgical treatment of neck PDAC. While sLP appears to offer better long-term outcomes, the heterogeneity of the study population limits generalizability. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the most effective surgical approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Updates in Surgery
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02453-1
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical management of pancreatic neck cancer: an ongoing dilemma

Giuseppe Quero, Claudio Fiorillo, Roberta Menghi, Fausto Rosa et al.
Updates in Surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Surgical management of pancreatic neck cancer: an ongoing dilemma

Giuseppe Quero, Claudio Fiorillo, Roberta Menghi, Fausto Rosa, Sergio Alfieri, Lodovica Langellotti, Davide De Sio, Vincenzo Tondolo, Chiara Lucinato, Beatrice Biffoni
article en

Abstract

The surgical management of pancreatic neck adenocarcinoma (neck PDAC) ranges from extended pancreaticoduodenectomy (ePD) to subtotal left pancreatectomy (sLP) and total pancreatectomy, with no clear consensus on the optimal approach. This study aimed to compare ePD and sLP in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes. All patients who underwent ePD or sLP for neck PDAC were retrospectively reviewed and compared for perioperative and long-term outcomes. Forty-six patients were included: 18 (39.1%) underwent ePD and 28 (60.9%) sLP. ePD was associated with a higher rate of neoadjuvant treatment, longer operative time, and longer hospital stay. The most frequently involved lymph-node stations were #13-17 in the ePD group (44.4%) and #18 in the sLP group (42.9%). Overall survival (OS) was similar (p = 0.06), while disease-free survival (DFS) was longer in the sLP group (16 [9-22] vs 12 [5-18] months in the ePD group; p = 0.03). Due to the high rate of nodal metastases in station #13-17 and #18, both procedures may be inadequate as surgical treatment of neck PDAC. While sLP appears to offer better long-term outcomes, the heterogeneity of the study population limits generalizability. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the most effective surgical approach.

Updates in Surgery
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Fatebenefratelli Hospital (IT)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.