Decision analysis rooted in Indigenous and Western scientific knowledge identifies cost‐effective strategies for managing hyperabundant deer to restore keystone places

Abstract The hyperabundance of herbivores—a result of altered human relationality with the land and the extirpation of predators—is leading to large‐scale degradation of keystone ecosystems across the globe. Designing and implementing socially acceptable and cost‐effective strategies that meaningfully reduce herbivore populations while allowing for the recovery of ecological function and cultural relationality is an inherently complex issue. As a result, decision paralysis is common, leading to delayed or avoided action and continued ecosystem loss and degradation. Using a structured decision‐making process that incorporated expert elicitation, population modelling and cost‐effectiveness analyses while honouring multiple knowledge systems, we identified five discrete and four portfolio strategies for managing hyperabundant black‐tailed deer ( Odocoileus hemionus columbianus ) in the Southern Gulf Islands of British Columbia, Canada, with consideration to benefit, feasibility and cost objectives. Hunting led by local Indigenous Nations was ranked the most cost‐effective strategy when benefits considered well‐being of peoples and place holistically, and accounted for both Indigenous and Western science worldviews. When only Western perspectives were included, increased licensed hunting by local communities and hiring professional deer reduction specialists were ranked the most cost‐effective. However, while increased licensed hunting had a >50% likelihood of project uptake and success (i.e. feasibility), the strategy had <50% likelihood of achieving any benefit objective. In comparison, Indigenous‐led hunting, professional deer reduction specialists, and all portfolio strategies had >50% likelihood of meeting at least one benefit objective, although only Indigenous‐led hunting also had >50% likelihood of achieving feasibility objectives. Synthesis and applications . We provide a roadmap for decision‐makers across the globe to robustly and transparently assess the problem of herbivore hyperabundance and inform solutions within their context. Within the Salish Sea, our work highlights the need to support hunting, and in particular, Indigenous‐led hunting, as cost‐effective strategies to promote revitalization of well‐being of peoples and place. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70136
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision analysis rooted in Indigenous and Western scientific knowledge identifies cost‐effective strategies for managing hyperabundant deer to restore keystone places

Nadine Thomas, David R. Bedford, Eric S. Long, Peter W. Dunwiddie et al.
People and Nature
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Decision analysis rooted in Indigenous and Western scientific knowledge identifies cost‐effective strategies for managing hyperabundant deer to restore keystone places

Nadine Thomas, David R. Bedford, Eric S. Long, Peter W. Dunwiddie, Jean‐Louis Martin, Tara G. Martin, Steve Michel, Sofie McComb, Kephra Beckett, Todd Golumbia, Peter Arcese, Robyn L. Irvine, Alvin James, Jason T. Fisher, Sujitha Thomas, Emily K. Gonzales, Thi’h’elum Sylvester, T’awaxwultun Akerman, W̱IĆKINEM Pelkey
article en

Abstract

Abstract The hyperabundance of herbivores—a result of altered human relationality with the land and the extirpation of predators—is leading to large‐scale degradation of keystone ecosystems across the globe. Designing and implementing socially acceptable and cost‐effective strategies that meaningfully reduce herbivore populations while allowing for the recovery of ecological function and cultural relationality is an inherently complex issue. As a result, decision paralysis is common, leading to delayed or avoided action and continued ecosystem loss and degradation. Using a structured decision‐making process that incorporated expert elicitation, population modelling and cost‐effectiveness analyses while honouring multiple knowledge systems, we identified five discrete and four portfolio strategies for managing hyperabundant black‐tailed deer ( Odocoileus hemionus columbianus ) in the Southern Gulf Islands of British Columbia, Canada, with consideration to benefit, feasibility and cost objectives. Hunting led by local Indigenous Nations was ranked the most cost‐effective strategy when benefits considered well‐being of peoples and place holistically, and accounted for both Indigenous and Western science worldviews. When only Western perspectives were included, increased licensed hunting by local communities and hiring professional deer reduction specialists were ranked the most cost‐effective. However, while increased licensed hunting had a >50% likelihood of project uptake and success (i.e. feasibility), the strategy had <50% likelihood of achieving any benefit objective. In comparison, Indigenous‐led hunting, professional deer reduction specialists, and all portfolio strategies had >50% likelihood of meeting at least one benefit objective, although only Indigenous‐led hunting also had >50% likelihood of achieving feasibility objectives. Synthesis and applications . We provide a roadmap for decision‐makers across the globe to robustly and transparently assess the problem of herbivore hyperabundance and inform solutions within their context. Within the Salish Sea, our work highlights the need to support hunting, and in particular, Indigenous‐led hunting, as cost‐effective strategies to promote revitalization of well‐being of peoples and place. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 8(1)
Seattle Pacific University (US), Parks Canada (CA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), British Council (GB), WaterNSW (AU), University of British Columbia (CA), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), University of Washington (US), University of Victoria (CA), Marine Conservation Institute (US), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier (FR), Government of British Columbia (CA), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Western Forest Products (CA)
Parks Canada, Liber Ero Foundation, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.