Structural conflict and democratic self-sabotage in Africa: a decolonial-conceptual statement

This article is a conceptual intervention in the debate on the so-called democratic backsliding in Africa, and challenges the dominant narratives for overlooking more fundamental structural questions. Rather than mere erosion of democratic gains, I contend that recurring crises of democratization are manifestations of an enduring Structural Conflict (SC) in the political culture of African countries. SC refers to the dissonance between colonial political structures and indigenous popular agency. To capture this, I introduce two types of political agency— Dominant Majority Demo-Agency (DMD + ) , where citizens exercise genuine control, and Dominant Minority Demo-Agency (DMD − ) , where elites monopolize power—as novel tools for diagnosing Africa’s hollow democratic transitions. Building on Frantz Fanon’s analysis of coloniality, I theorize internalized structural inferiority as the mechanism through which many African states valorize external models and devalue indigenous ones. It is this internalization, I argue, that generates democratic self-sabotage : the embrace of alien structures that appear democratic while disabling majority agency and manifesting in coups, violent extremism, electoral disillusionment, and conflict. While recognizing Africa’s diversity, I propose Structural Blackening as a corrective: the deliberate reconstitution of political systems with indigenous agency, epistemologies, and aspirations. Structural Blackening offers a path toward authentic democratic emancipation rooted in epistemic and structural rebellion against coloniality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1620478
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural conflict and democratic self-sabotage in Africa: a decolonial-conceptual statement

Muhammad Dan Suleiman
Frontiers in Political Science
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Structural conflict and democratic self-sabotage in Africa: a decolonial-conceptual statement

Muhammad Dan Suleiman
article en

Abstract

This article is a conceptual intervention in the debate on the so-called democratic backsliding in Africa, and challenges the dominant narratives for overlooking more fundamental structural questions. Rather than mere erosion of democratic gains, I contend that recurring crises of democratization are manifestations of an enduring Structural Conflict (SC) in the political culture of African countries. SC refers to the dissonance between colonial political structures and indigenous popular agency. To capture this, I introduce two types of political agency— Dominant Majority Demo-Agency (DMD + ) , where citizens exercise genuine control, and Dominant Minority Demo-Agency (DMD − ) , where elites monopolize power—as novel tools for diagnosing Africa’s hollow democratic transitions. Building on Frantz Fanon’s analysis of coloniality, I theorize internalized structural inferiority as the mechanism through which many African states valorize external models and devalue indigenous ones. It is this internalization, I argue, that generates democratic self-sabotage : the embrace of alien structures that appear democratic while disabling majority agency and manifesting in coups, violent extremism, electoral disillusionment, and conflict. While recognizing Africa’s diversity, I propose Structural Blackening as a corrective: the deliberate reconstitution of political systems with indigenous agency, epistemologies, and aspirations. Structural Blackening offers a path toward authentic democratic emancipation rooted in epistemic and structural rebellion against coloniality.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 7
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.