Quality of Life Outcomes After Fundoplication-Augmented One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Comparative Study

Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) frequently persists despite weight reduction, thereby diminishing anticipated improvements in quality of life following bariatric surgery. While one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is metabolically effective, it may not completely manage reflux symptoms. This study assessed whether the incorporation of a modified fundoplication could enhance symptom control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with OAGB alone. Methods A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted involving 60 patients diagnosed with obesity and GERD. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups for a follow-up period of two years: Group A underwent OAGB only, and Group B received OAGB with modified fundoplication. Outcomes were evaluated based on preoperative and postoperative upper GI and manometry findings, as well as postoperative GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) scores. Results In comparison to OAGB alone, fundoplication demonstrated superior symptom control (Visick 2.10 ± 0.71 vs. 3.57 ± 0.73; p = 0.001) and resulted in a shorter duration of PPI use (2.43 ± 0.62 vs. 3.13 ± 0.68 months; p = 0.001). The GERD-HRQL scores showed significant improvement following fundoplication at six months (48.33 ± 7.91 to 31.57 ± 3.90; p < 0.001), and this improvement was sustained up to 24 months, whereas the changes observed after OAGB alone were not statistically significant. At the 24-month mark, endoscopic evaluation revealed an intact wrap with no evidence of GERD, and manometry confirmed restoration of LES function. Conclusions Compared with OAGB alone, the combination of OAGB with modified fundoplication offers a distinct advantage in terms of quality of life, as evidenced by improved symptom scores, decreased reliance on proton pump inhibitors, and enhanced endoscopic and manometric control of reflux. This integrated approach represents a viable strategy for optimizing the HRQoL of patients with obesity and GERD. However, validation through larger multicenter studies with extended follow-up periods and pH impedance monitoring is necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96802
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Life Outcomes After Fundoplication-Augmented One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Comparative Study

Osama Fouad, Mostafa Mahran, H Elmaleh, Reem Salah et al.
Cureus
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Quality of Life Outcomes After Fundoplication-Augmented One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Comparative Study

Osama Fouad, Mostafa Mahran, H Elmaleh, Reem Salah, Rofida Sobh
article en

Abstract

Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) frequently persists despite weight reduction, thereby diminishing anticipated improvements in quality of life following bariatric surgery. While one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is metabolically effective, it may not completely manage reflux symptoms. This study assessed whether the incorporation of a modified fundoplication could enhance symptom control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with OAGB alone. Methods A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted involving 60 patients diagnosed with obesity and GERD. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups for a follow-up period of two years: Group A underwent OAGB only, and Group B received OAGB with modified fundoplication. Outcomes were evaluated based on preoperative and postoperative upper GI and manometry findings, as well as postoperative GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) scores. Results In comparison to OAGB alone, fundoplication demonstrated superior symptom control (Visick 2.10 ± 0.71 vs. 3.57 ± 0.73; p = 0.001) and resulted in a shorter duration of PPI use (2.43 ± 0.62 vs. 3.13 ± 0.68 months; p = 0.001). The GERD-HRQL scores showed significant improvement following fundoplication at six months (48.33 ± 7.91 to 31.57 ± 3.90; p < 0.001), and this improvement was sustained up to 24 months, whereas the changes observed after OAGB alone were not statistically significant. At the 24-month mark, endoscopic evaluation revealed an intact wrap with no evidence of GERD, and manometry confirmed restoration of LES function. Conclusions Compared with OAGB alone, the combination of OAGB with modified fundoplication offers a distinct advantage in terms of quality of life, as evidenced by improved symptom scores, decreased reliance on proton pump inhibitors, and enhanced endoscopic and manometric control of reflux. This integrated approach represents a viable strategy for optimizing the HRQoL of patients with obesity and GERD. However, validation through larger multicenter studies with extended follow-up periods and pH impedance monitoring is necessary.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Ain Shams University (EG), Homerton University Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.