Perception of Direct-to-Consumer Orthodontics in Saudi Arabia

Introduction Direct-to-consumer orthodontics (DTCO) has gained popularity in some countries as a convenient and affordable alternative to traditional care, especially with the rise of clear aligners. Despite increasing use, concerns remain regarding the lack of professional supervision. While DTCO trends have been examined in other countries, there is limited data on public perception in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to assess interest in and preferences for DTCO versus conventional orthodontic treatment in Saudi Arabia. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 507 adults aged 20 to 60 years across Saudi Arabia. A structured, self-administered questionnaire was used, consisting of demographic questions and 30 items that assessed the primary outcome variables: levels of awareness, perceptions, and preferences regarding direct-to-consumer orthodontics (DTCO) compared with traditional in-office orthodontic care. Convenience sampling was employed, and participants were recruited through social media platforms and direct outreach across various regions of Saudi Arabia. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20, and chi-squared tests were applied for categorical variables. Results Of the participants, 44% were familiar with clear aligners, but only 16% had heard of DTCO. Despite this, 70% expressed willingness to consider DTCO for themselves or their children. Convenience was identified as the main advantage, while key concerns included lack of supervision and uncertainty regarding treatment quality. Furthermore, 82% believed radiographs were essential for diagnosis, and 84% were aware of the risks of unsupervised treatment. Discussion Although interest in DTCO continues to rise, limited awareness of its risks suggests that marketing influences patient decisions more strongly than clinical understanding. These findings highlight the need for improved patient education. While DTCO offers flexibility, the absence of professional oversight remains a major concern. Conclusion The findings indicate that although public awareness of direct-to-consumer orthodontics (DTCO) remains limited, there is considerable interest in utilizing such services, primarily driven by their perceived convenience and affordability. However, major concerns persist regarding treatment supervision, safety, and diagnostic accuracy. These findings emphasize the need for public education on the importance of professionally supervised orthodontic care and the potential complications associated with unsupervised treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106389130251022101306
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception of Direct-to-Consumer Orthodontics in Saudi Arabia

Hasan Kadi, Raneem Mohammed Habis, Waleed Taju, Rahaf Khalid Jarwan et al.
The Open Dentistry Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Perception of Direct-to-Consumer Orthodontics in Saudi Arabia

Hasan Kadi, Raneem Mohammed Habis, Waleed Taju, Rahaf Khalid Jarwan, Mishal Salim Aloufi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Direct-to-consumer orthodontics (DTCO) has gained popularity in some countries as a convenient and affordable alternative to traditional care, especially with the rise of clear aligners. Despite increasing use, concerns remain regarding the lack of professional supervision. While DTCO trends have been examined in other countries, there is limited data on public perception in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to assess interest in and preferences for DTCO versus conventional orthodontic treatment in Saudi Arabia. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 507 adults aged 20 to 60 years across Saudi Arabia. A structured, self-administered questionnaire was used, consisting of demographic questions and 30 items that assessed the primary outcome variables: levels of awareness, perceptions, and preferences regarding direct-to-consumer orthodontics (DTCO) compared with traditional in-office orthodontic care. Convenience sampling was employed, and participants were recruited through social media platforms and direct outreach across various regions of Saudi Arabia. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20, and chi-squared tests were applied for categorical variables. Results Of the participants, 44% were familiar with clear aligners, but only 16% had heard of DTCO. Despite this, 70% expressed willingness to consider DTCO for themselves or their children. Convenience was identified as the main advantage, while key concerns included lack of supervision and uncertainty regarding treatment quality. Furthermore, 82% believed radiographs were essential for diagnosis, and 84% were aware of the risks of unsupervised treatment. Discussion Although interest in DTCO continues to rise, limited awareness of its risks suggests that marketing influences patient decisions more strongly than clinical understanding. These findings highlight the need for improved patient education. While DTCO offers flexibility, the absence of professional oversight remains a major concern. Conclusion The findings indicate that although public awareness of direct-to-consumer orthodontics (DTCO) remains limited, there is considerable interest in utilizing such services, primarily driven by their perceived convenience and affordability. However, major concerns persist regarding treatment supervision, safety, and diagnostic accuracy. These findings emphasize the need for public education on the importance of professionally supervised orthodontic care and the potential complications associated with unsupervised treatment.

The Open Dentistry JournalVol. 19(1)
Umm al-Qura University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.