Effects of stunning methods on fish welfare and meat quality: A review

• This review studies the effect of stunning methods on fish welfare and meat quality • Stress-inducing methods cause anaerobic glycolysis in fish and reduce meat quality • Stress-less stunning methods are beneficial for fish welfare and meat quality • Combined stunning methods can overcome the limitations of individual ones Stunning technique greatly influences the intensity of stress response, which eventually impact the fish welfare and meat quality. This review synthesizes published data (from Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus) to evaluate six mainstream stunning methods, including mechanical stunning, asphyxia, hypothermia, electrical stunning, chemical anesthesia, and gas stunning, and their impacts on fish welfare and meat quality. Highlighted findings show that stress-inducing methods (e.g., asphyxia, hypothermia, CO₂/N₂ narcosis) induce behavioral, neurological, and physiological distress, while impairing meat quality via altered pH values, rigor mortis, water-holding capacity (WHC), texture, total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), color, and sensory attributes. Mechanistically, stress activates anaerobic glycolysis, causing lactic acid accumulation, muscle acidification, protein denaturation, and subsequent meat quality degradation. In contrast, stress-less methods (e.g., mechanical and electrical stunning) effectively enhance both fish welfare and meat quality. This review provides critical insights for advancing stunning technology, addressing ethical concerns, and improving meat quality in the fish industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Future Foods
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfutfo.2025.08.016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of stunning methods on fish welfare and meat quality: A review

Zhongxiang Fang, Zi-Chao Wang, Yuzhen Yan
1 citations
Journal of Future Foods
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.19
article

Effects of stunning methods on fish welfare and meat quality: A review

Zhongxiang Fang, Zi-Chao Wang, Yuzhen Yan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• This review studies the effect of stunning methods on fish welfare and meat quality • Stress-inducing methods cause anaerobic glycolysis in fish and reduce meat quality • Stress-less stunning methods are beneficial for fish welfare and meat quality • Combined stunning methods can overcome the limitations of individual ones Stunning technique greatly influences the intensity of stress response, which eventually impact the fish welfare and meat quality. This review synthesizes published data (from Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus) to evaluate six mainstream stunning methods, including mechanical stunning, asphyxia, hypothermia, electrical stunning, chemical anesthesia, and gas stunning, and their impacts on fish welfare and meat quality. Highlighted findings show that stress-inducing methods (e.g., asphyxia, hypothermia, CO₂/N₂ narcosis) induce behavioral, neurological, and physiological distress, while impairing meat quality via altered pH values, rigor mortis, water-holding capacity (WHC), texture, total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), color, and sensory attributes. Mechanistically, stress activates anaerobic glycolysis, causing lactic acid accumulation, muscle acidification, protein denaturation, and subsequent meat quality degradation. In contrast, stress-less methods (e.g., mechanical and electrical stunning) effectively enhance both fish welfare and meat quality. This review provides critical insights for advancing stunning technology, addressing ethical concerns, and improving meat quality in the fish industry.

Journal of Future Foods
Ankang University (CN), The University of Melbourne (AU), Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.