Vitamin D Status as a Late Pregnancy Biomarker of Perceived Stress
<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Stress during pregnancy critically impacts maternal and fetal health. While prior research has linked sociodemographic and biological factors to stress levels, the role of specific biomarkers, such as vitamin D (VD), remains unexplored. This study examined the relationships among sociodemographic factors, VD status (as measured by serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration), and perceived stress in pregnant women. We hypothesized that 25(OH)D concentration would be associated with perceived stress levels during pregnancy. <b>Methods</b>: A <i>post hoc</i> analysis of the Kellogg Pregnancy VD study was conducted on a cohort of 232 pregnant women with Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) scores at months 2, 5, and 7 with corresponding 25(OH)D concentrations. PSS-10 scores were classified into two groups: patients with scores of 0-13 were considered to have low stress, while those with scores of 14-40 were considered to have moderate-to-high stress. Logistic regression models identified factors associated with moderate-to-high stress. <b>Results</b>: At month 2, univariate analyses showed that being married (<i>p</i> = 0.002), having a college education (<i>p</i> = 0.0013), and lower BMI (<i>p</i> = 0.018) were associated with lower perceived stress, whereas Black race was associated with higher perceived stress (<i>p</i> = 0.027). By month 7, higher serum 25(OH)D concentration was the only significant predictor of perceived stress in univariate analysis (<i>p</i> = 0.002). In multivariate models at month 7, 25(OH)D approached significance (<i>p</i> = 0.053). <b>Conclusions</b>: Early in pregnancy, race, marital status, college education, and BMI were significantly associated with PSS-10 score. By month 7, 25(OH)D concentration over time emerged as a factor that was significantly associated in univariate analysis and showed a trend toward significance in multivariate models. VD status, as measured by 25(OH)D concentration, may act as a biomarker of stress during pregnancy. Results warrant further study in prospective intervention trials.
Authors
- Bruce W. Hollis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2588-5568)
- Myla Ebeling (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5690-5245)
- Carol L. Wagner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2764-6533)
- Maya F. Andrade (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7936-0425)
- Martin Hewison (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5806-9690)
- Judith Shary (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2064-1043)
- Mathew J. Gregoski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6939-5771)
- Anjali G. Borsum
Institutions
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nutrients
- Published
- 2025-11-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223553
- Primary Topic
- Vitamin D Research Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Medical University of South Carolina
- W.K. Kellogg Foundation
- University of South Carolina
- National Institutes of Health
- South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina