RapidPlan Knowledge-Based Radiotherapy Planning Compared to Manual Planning in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Treatment planning for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents dosimetric challenges due to the proximity of critical structures. RapidPlan (RP), a knowledge-based planning (KBP) system, offers the potential for improved plan consistency and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. The objective of this study was to compare dosimetric and clinical outcomes of RP-generated plans versus manually optimized plans in patients with stage III NSCLC undergoing IMRT or VMAT. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective analysis, 50 patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation for stage III NSCLC at Hadassah Medical Center (2015-2021) were analyzed. RP plans were generated using a lung-specific model in the Eclipse treatment planning system and compared with the original clinical manual plans. Dosimetric parameters for target volumes and OARs were evaluated, and subgroup analyses were performed by technique (IMRT vs. VMAT). Toxicity and survival outcomes were analyzed, and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) modeling was conducted. <b>Results:</b> RP significantly reduced mean heart dose (Δ = -2.54 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.001), spinal cord maximum dose (Δ = -4.08 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and esophageal mean dose (Δ = -3.89 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with manual plans. Lung doses were slightly higher in RP plans (V20 Δ = +2.12%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). VMAT-RP plans demonstrated greater cardiac and esophageal sparing than VMAT-manual plans. RP yielded significant NTCP reductions for the heart (0.34% → 0.20%) and esophagus (16.6% → 11.5%), but no improvement for lung or spinal cord. Lung toxicity ≥ grade 2 was associated with reduced overall survival (16.2 vs. 51.8 months, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> RapidPlan-based knowledge-based planning enhances OAR sparing while maintaining target coverage in locally advanced NSCLC. Slight increases in lung dose highlight the need for ongoing model refinement. An association between lung toxicity and reduced survival was observed, underscoring the impact of treatment-related morbidity on outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223654
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RapidPlan Knowledge-Based Radiotherapy Planning Compared to Manual Planning in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Antoni Skripai, Yakir Rottenberg, Johnathan Arnon, Try Gustaf Said et al.
Cancers
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

RapidPlan Knowledge-Based Radiotherapy Planning Compared to Manual Planning in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Antoni Skripai, Yakir Rottenberg, Johnathan Arnon, Try Gustaf Said, Tal Falick Michaeli, Stanislav Raskin, Philip Blumenfeld
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Treatment planning for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents dosimetric challenges due to the proximity of critical structures. RapidPlan (RP), a knowledge-based planning (KBP) system, offers the potential for improved plan consistency and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. The objective of this study was to compare dosimetric and clinical outcomes of RP-generated plans versus manually optimized plans in patients with stage III NSCLC undergoing IMRT or VMAT. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective analysis, 50 patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation for stage III NSCLC at Hadassah Medical Center (2015-2021) were analyzed. RP plans were generated using a lung-specific model in the Eclipse treatment planning system and compared with the original clinical manual plans. Dosimetric parameters for target volumes and OARs were evaluated, and subgroup analyses were performed by technique (IMRT vs. VMAT). Toxicity and survival outcomes were analyzed, and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) modeling was conducted. <b>Results:</b> RP significantly reduced mean heart dose (Δ = -2.54 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.001), spinal cord maximum dose (Δ = -4.08 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and esophageal mean dose (Δ = -3.89 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with manual plans. Lung doses were slightly higher in RP plans (V20 Δ = +2.12%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). VMAT-RP plans demonstrated greater cardiac and esophageal sparing than VMAT-manual plans. RP yielded significant NTCP reductions for the heart (0.34% → 0.20%) and esophagus (16.6% → 11.5%), but no improvement for lung or spinal cord. Lung toxicity ≥ grade 2 was associated with reduced overall survival (16.2 vs. 51.8 months, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> RapidPlan-based knowledge-based planning enhances OAR sparing while maintaining target coverage in locally advanced NSCLC. Slight increases in lung dose highlight the need for ongoing model refinement. An association between lung toxicity and reduced survival was observed, underscoring the impact of treatment-related morbidity on outcomes.

CancersVol. 17(22)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.