A Stable Solution: Biomechanical Assessment of External Fixators for the Treatment of Pelvic Injury Type AO 61 C1.3a

This study aimed to analyse the load-deformation behaviour of pelves treated with external fixation following AO61C1.3a pelvic injury. Designing a biomechanical setup , the load-bearing capacity of pelves was assessed across varying pin configurations (two, three, or four external fixator pins). Mechanical parameters such as stiffness, peak-to-peak, valley-to-valley, fracture line, total displacement, deformation, and maximum load were derived to quantify pelvis stability. The 3-pin configuration demonstrated superior stability with significantly smaller pubis and sacral fracture displacements under all loading conditions (p<0.001), and was the only configuration below the clinical failure threshold. Notably, this configuration minimised fracture movement despite global outcome parameters showing no significant differences between the groups. These findings highlight the importance of fracture-specific stability over global stiffness in ensuring effective fixation. The results indicate that optimal biomechanical resistance to C1.3a pelvic instability is achieved through a combination of two pins on the injured side and a single pin on the stable hemipelvis using contemporary pin devices. This study offers the biomechanical basis required to facilitate the design and execution of clinical trials addressing pelvic ring injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Injury
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112831
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Stable Solution: Biomechanical Assessment of External Fixators for the Treatment of Pelvic Injury Type AO 61 C1.3a

Niels Hammer, Daniel Ch. Haspinger, Andreas Höch, Christian Kleber et al.
Injury
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

A Stable Solution: Biomechanical Assessment of External Fixators for the Treatment of Pelvic Injury Type AO 61 C1.3a

Niels Hammer, Daniel Ch. Haspinger, Andreas Höch, Christian Kleber, Petr Henyš, Axel Gänsslen, Annika Hela Meuser
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to analyse the load-deformation behaviour of pelves treated with external fixation following AO61C1.3a pelvic injury. Designing a biomechanical setup , the load-bearing capacity of pelves was assessed across varying pin configurations (two, three, or four external fixator pins). Mechanical parameters such as stiffness, peak-to-peak, valley-to-valley, fracture line, total displacement, deformation, and maximum load were derived to quantify pelvis stability. The 3-pin configuration demonstrated superior stability with significantly smaller pubis and sacral fracture displacements under all loading conditions (p<0.001), and was the only configuration below the clinical failure threshold. Notably, this configuration minimised fracture movement despite global outcome parameters showing no significant differences between the groups. These findings highlight the importance of fracture-specific stability over global stiffness in ensuring effective fixation. The results indicate that optimal biomechanical resistance to C1.3a pelvic instability is achieved through a combination of two pins on the injured side and a single pin on the stable hemipelvis using contemporary pin devices. This study offers the biomechanical basis required to facilitate the design and execution of clinical trials addressing pelvic ring injuries.

InjuryVol. 56(12)
Technical University of Liberec (CZ), Medical University of Graz (AT), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.