Global trends in the uptake of specialist diagnostic ultrasound and <scp>MRI</scp> scans for endometriosis: An international cross‐sectional survey

Endometriosis affects 1 in 10 women globally. We aimed to determine health provider involvement and preferred methods of obtaining an endometriosis diagnosis across international jurisdictions. A global cross-sectional survey, distributed through formal and informal FIGO Reproductive Medicine, Endocrinology, and Infertility (REI) committee networks from September through October 2024. A total of 445 respondents from 76 countries began the survey, with 360 completions. Of the respondents, 63.9% were female, with most being gynecologists. Academics and/or researchers comprised 6.7%, with 39.2% involved in research in some capacity. Endometriosis was largely diagnosed by gynecologists (95.0%), with most respondents overall describing ultrasound as the most common method of diagnosis (77.8%). Of those surveyed, 93.6% stated clinicians in their country used non-invasive imaging (predominantly ultrasound) to diagnose endometriosis before surgery. One third of respondents did not feel confident distinguishing between routine gynecological scans and specialist endometriosis imaging. Significant barriers for uptake of imaging diagnostics included access to training, cost, and geographical accessibility. Regarding adoption of non-invasive imaging in clinical care, "game-changing" effects were described, including improvements in surgical preoperative mapping, and patient-centered care, with concerns that it could increase clinical workloads. Significantly, shifts in endometriosis diagnosis, from visualization of lesions at laparoscopy to non-invasive imaging diagnostics, were observed internationally. Policies should aim to overcome barriers to uptake of imaging-based diagnostics by supporting training initiatives, reducing associated costs, and improving geographical accessibility. Respondents predicted transformative changes in endometriosis care once non-invasive endometriosis diagnostics are effectively adopted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70666
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global trends in the uptake of specialist diagnostic ultrasound and MRI scans for endometriosis: An international cross‐sectional survey

Dov Feldberg, Scott McGill Nelson, Alison Deslandes, Ajey Bhardwaj et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
1.70
article

Global trends in the uptake of specialist diagnostic ultrasound and MRI scans for endometriosis: An international cross‐sectional survey

Dov Feldberg, Scott McGill Nelson, Alison Deslandes, Ajey Bhardwaj, Jodie Avery, Mathew Leonardi, Edgar Mocanu, Anna Fragkoudi, Togas Tulandi, Eytan R. Barnea, Elif Göknur Topçu, Laurie Henry, M. Louise Hull, Jaideep Malhotra, Nikhil Purandare
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Endometriosis affects 1 in 10 women globally. We aimed to determine health provider involvement and preferred methods of obtaining an endometriosis diagnosis across international jurisdictions. A global cross-sectional survey, distributed through formal and informal FIGO Reproductive Medicine, Endocrinology, and Infertility (REI) committee networks from September through October 2024. A total of 445 respondents from 76 countries began the survey, with 360 completions. Of the respondents, 63.9% were female, with most being gynecologists. Academics and/or researchers comprised 6.7%, with 39.2% involved in research in some capacity. Endometriosis was largely diagnosed by gynecologists (95.0%), with most respondents overall describing ultrasound as the most common method of diagnosis (77.8%). Of those surveyed, 93.6% stated clinicians in their country used non-invasive imaging (predominantly ultrasound) to diagnose endometriosis before surgery. One third of respondents did not feel confident distinguishing between routine gynecological scans and specialist endometriosis imaging. Significant barriers for uptake of imaging diagnostics included access to training, cost, and geographical accessibility. Regarding adoption of non-invasive imaging in clinical care, "game-changing" effects were described, including improvements in surgical preoperative mapping, and patient-centered care, with concerns that it could increase clinical workloads. Significantly, shifts in endometriosis diagnosis, from visualization of lesions at laparoscopy to non-invasive imaging diagnostics, were observed internationally. Policies should aim to overcome barriers to uptake of imaging-based diagnostics by supporting training initiatives, reducing associated costs, and improving geographical accessibility. Respondents predicted transformative changes in endometriosis care once non-invasive endometriosis diagnostics are effectively adopted.

International Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsVol. 172(1)
University of Miami (US), Tel Aviv University (IL), Rotunda Hospital (IE), Women's and Children's Hospital (AU), University Hospital Galway (IE), Bible College of South Australia (AU), CARE Fertility (US), QT Ultrasound (United States) (US), Memorial Sisli Hospital (TR), Health Foundation (GB), Rainbow Medical (Israel) (IL), Rainbow Children's Hospital (IN), Centre hospitalier régional de la Citadelle (BE), McGill University (CA), The University of Adelaide (AU), University of Glasgow (GB), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.