CANTech Justice: Grassroots Responses to Digital Bias and Technological Power in the Canadian Context

ABSTRACT Our co‐authored article investigates how grassroots arts and culture organizations engage technology as a site of justice‐oriented practice. Drawing on primary‐source interviews with Canadian grassroots arts and culture organizations, we outline an EDI‐infused technological praxis we call CANTech Justice (CTJ). CTJ provides a framework for understanding how cultural and artistic organizations resist exclusionary technologies and imagine justice‐centered alternatives. Rather than rejecting digital tools outright, these organizations engage in re‐purposing and re‐scripting—transforming existing technologies through creative, relational, and politically‐grounded practices that challenge dominant design norms and assert community control. CTJ also responds to the dominance of U.S.‐based technological infrastructures and frameworks in digital justice discourse. It does so by foregrounding locally‐rooted, intersectional approaches to technological agency. However, CTJ operates within the Canadian settler state—a nation built on land theft, resource dispossession, and cultural genocide of Indigenous peoples. These conditions set clear limits to what CTJ strategies can achieve, particularly in relation to decolonial interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversity & Inclusion Research
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/dvr2.70041
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CANTech Justice: Grassroots Responses to Digital Bias and Technological Power in the Canadian Context

Evangeline Holtz‐Schramek, Zeinab Farokhi
Diversity & Inclusion Research
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

CANTech Justice: Grassroots Responses to Digital Bias and Technological Power in the Canadian Context

Evangeline Holtz‐Schramek, Zeinab Farokhi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Our co‐authored article investigates how grassroots arts and culture organizations engage technology as a site of justice‐oriented practice. Drawing on primary‐source interviews with Canadian grassroots arts and culture organizations, we outline an EDI‐infused technological praxis we call CANTech Justice (CTJ). CTJ provides a framework for understanding how cultural and artistic organizations resist exclusionary technologies and imagine justice‐centered alternatives. Rather than rejecting digital tools outright, these organizations engage in re‐purposing and re‐scripting—transforming existing technologies through creative, relational, and politically‐grounded practices that challenge dominant design norms and assert community control. CTJ also responds to the dominance of U.S.‐based technological infrastructures and frameworks in digital justice discourse. It does so by foregrounding locally‐rooted, intersectional approaches to technological agency. However, CTJ operates within the Canadian settler state—a nation built on land theft, resource dispossession, and cultural genocide of Indigenous peoples. These conditions set clear limits to what CTJ strategies can achieve, particularly in relation to decolonial interventions.

Diversity & Inclusion ResearchVol. 3(1)
University of Toronto (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.