Clinical Use of <scp>McHale</scp> 's Coparenting Scale: Case Examples and Insights for Practitioners From an International Coparenting Collaborative

ABSTRACT An important accomplishment in systemic consultations and interventions is helping the family's coparents—individuals mutually responsible for the child's care and upbringing—to become more mindful about ways they can ally together to support their children. One means of stimulating coparenting dialogues is to guide intentional reflection on coparenting‐related actions related to engagement, teamwork, conflict and child focus. One instrument designed to evoke such reflection, the Coparenting Scale, is effective in triggering parent insights and dialogues about coparenting behaviours and dynamics if used intentionally by therapists. The instrument is uniquely designed to provide visuals for parents (stick figure cartoons) portraying two adults and a child in everyday activities connoting signs of affection and togetherness, handling discipline in the family, differences of opinion with the coparent and actions engaged in when alone with the child which affect the solidarity of the coparenting alliance (covert coparenting). Reflection on these items builds insight into behaviour not always consciously in mind, and dynamics not typically discussed openly or effectively with their coparent. Primed to enable such conversation, while resolute about the meaning of coparenting behaviour for children's family‐level security, practitioners can help coparents strengthen determination to mindfully engage in behavioural changes to promote greater family integrity at home through teamwork and to reduce child‐related conflict. Cases from Italy, Sweden, the United States and Israel illustrate implementation variations and impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.70026
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Use of McHale 's Coparenting Scale: Case Examples and Insights for Practitioners From an International Coparenting Collaborative

Martina Maria Mensi, Silvia Mazzoni, Antoinette Corboz‐Warnery, Monica Hedenbro et al.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy
Family Dynamics and Relationships
article

Clinical Use of McHale 's Coparenting Scale: Case Examples and Insights for Practitioners From an International Coparenting Collaborative

Martina Maria Mensi, Silvia Mazzoni, Antoinette Corboz‐Warnery, Monica Hedenbro, Diane A. Philipp, Selin Salman‐Engin, Élisabeth Fivaz-Depeursinge, Miri Keren, Michele Marchesi, Erica E. Coates, Hervé Tissot, James P. McHale, Russia Collins
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT An important accomplishment in systemic consultations and interventions is helping the family's coparents—individuals mutually responsible for the child's care and upbringing—to become more mindful about ways they can ally together to support their children. One means of stimulating coparenting dialogues is to guide intentional reflection on coparenting‐related actions related to engagement, teamwork, conflict and child focus. One instrument designed to evoke such reflection, the Coparenting Scale, is effective in triggering parent insights and dialogues about coparenting behaviours and dynamics if used intentionally by therapists. The instrument is uniquely designed to provide visuals for parents (stick figure cartoons) portraying two adults and a child in everyday activities connoting signs of affection and togetherness, handling discipline in the family, differences of opinion with the coparent and actions engaged in when alone with the child which affect the solidarity of the coparenting alliance (covert coparenting). Reflection on these items builds insight into behaviour not always consciously in mind, and dynamics not typically discussed openly or effectively with their coparent. Primed to enable such conversation, while resolute about the meaning of coparenting behaviour for children's family‐level security, practitioners can help coparents strengthen determination to mindfully engage in behavioural changes to promote greater family integrity at home through teamwork and to reduce child‐related conflict. Cases from Italy, Sweden, the United States and Israel illustrate implementation variations and impact.

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family TherapyVol. 46(4)
Bar-Ilan University (IL), Bilkent University (TR), Georgetown University (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Pavia (IT), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), Foundation Center (US), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino (IT), Urology Foundation (GB), University of South Florida St. Petersburg (US), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.