What is Freedom of Speech? How Citizens Define and Perceive the “Bulwark of Liberty”

Freedom of speech is an essential pillar of democracy. Despite constitutional protections, citizens in some liberal democracies increasingly feel the “bulwark of liberty” under pressure. While the underlying causes of these developments remain largely ambiguous, a fundamental question persists: What exactly do citizens have in mind when assessing the concept of “freedom of speech” – and who do they believe is restricting it? Clarifying this is essential for interpreting survey data, understanding underlying causes, and developing effective strategies to counter this trend. A quota-representative national survey of German citizens ( N = 1,490) reveals (1) that most respondents perceive free speech in both legal and social terms. Additionally, (2) a notable portion perceives freedom of speech as too restricted, driven by both dimensions, slightly emphasizing the legal aspect. Finally, (3) perceptions of the general status quo and both dimensions are – at least partly – shaped by different actors, underscoring the need to distinguish the social and the legal dimensions of freedom of speech.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Press/Politics
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251388182
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is Freedom of Speech? How Citizens Define and Perceive the “Bulwark of Liberty”

Anna-Luisa Sacher, Carsten Reinemann
The International Journal of Press/Politics
Social Media and Politics
article

What is Freedom of Speech? How Citizens Define and Perceive the “Bulwark of Liberty”

Anna-Luisa Sacher, Carsten Reinemann
article en

Abstract

Freedom of speech is an essential pillar of democracy. Despite constitutional protections, citizens in some liberal democracies increasingly feel the “bulwark of liberty” under pressure. While the underlying causes of these developments remain largely ambiguous, a fundamental question persists: What exactly do citizens have in mind when assessing the concept of “freedom of speech” – and who do they believe is restricting it? Clarifying this is essential for interpreting survey data, understanding underlying causes, and developing effective strategies to counter this trend. A quota-representative national survey of German citizens ( N = 1,490) reveals (1) that most respondents perceive free speech in both legal and social terms. Additionally, (2) a notable portion perceives freedom of speech as too restricted, driven by both dimensions, slightly emphasizing the legal aspect. Finally, (3) perceptions of the general status quo and both dimensions are – at least partly – shaped by different actors, underscoring the need to distinguish the social and the legal dimensions of freedom of speech.

The International Journal of Press/Politics
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What is Freedom of Speech? How Citizens Define and Perceive the “Bulwark of Liberty” — Anna-Luisa Sacher, Carsten Reinemann · The International Journal of Press/Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS