Effect of Different Accelerator Systems on the Processing, Mechanical, Dynamic, and Network Properties of Natural Rubber Vulcanizates

ABSTRACT In this work, the efficiency of various primary and secondary accelerators on natural rubber (NR) vulcanizates was compared. Twelve formulations were prepared with six accelerators in a conventional sulfur system. The effects on rheological, mechanical, dynamic mechanical, abrasion, and set properties were evaluated. Chemical probe treatments were used to study crosslink types, and their influence on crosslink density was also examined. The data, including crosslink density and distribution types for various curatives, were correlated with mechanical and aging properties. Accelerators showed synergistic effects, producing either higher or lower physical properties than expected. The CBS+TMTD system exhibited the fastest cure rate index (CRI = 34.6 min −1 ), more than double that of CBS+DPG (13.4 min −1 ) TMTD‐based systems achieved a modulus of 11.5 MPa and a cure rate index (CRI) of 34.6 min −1 . TMTD‐based binary systems achieved the highest modulus at 300% elongation (≈11.5 MPa), compared to 8.1 MPa for MBTS+ZBEC. CBS‐based vulcanizates showed the best retention of properties after aging, with only ~8% reduction in tensile strength compared to ~17% for TBBS+ZBEC. Results also indicated that less polar accelerators formed crosslinks with longer sulfur chains, that is, more polysulfidic in nature, while accelerators with higher polarity produced networks with shorter sulfur crosslinks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Engineering and Science
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.70181
Primary Topic
Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Different Accelerator Systems on the Processing, Mechanical, Dynamic, and Network Properties of Natural Rubber Vulcanizates

Sujith Nair, Debabrata Ganguly, Santanu Chattopadhyay, Vaibhav Kumar Arya et al.
Polymer Engineering and Science
Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
article

Effect of Different Accelerator Systems on the Processing, Mechanical, Dynamic, and Network Properties of Natural Rubber Vulcanizates

Sujith Nair, Debabrata Ganguly, Santanu Chattopadhyay, Vaibhav Kumar Arya, Sambhu Bhadra, Tuhin Saha
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this work, the efficiency of various primary and secondary accelerators on natural rubber (NR) vulcanizates was compared. Twelve formulations were prepared with six accelerators in a conventional sulfur system. The effects on rheological, mechanical, dynamic mechanical, abrasion, and set properties were evaluated. Chemical probe treatments were used to study crosslink types, and their influence on crosslink density was also examined. The data, including crosslink density and distribution types for various curatives, were correlated with mechanical and aging properties. Accelerators showed synergistic effects, producing either higher or lower physical properties than expected. The CBS+TMTD system exhibited the fastest cure rate index (CRI = 34.6 min −1 ), more than double that of CBS+DPG (13.4 min −1 ) TMTD‐based systems achieved a modulus of 11.5 MPa and a cure rate index (CRI) of 34.6 min −1 . TMTD‐based binary systems achieved the highest modulus at 300% elongation (≈11.5 MPa), compared to 8.1 MPa for MBTS+ZBEC. CBS‐based vulcanizates showed the best retention of properties after aging, with only ~8% reduction in tensile strength compared to ~17% for TBBS+ZBEC. Results also indicated that less polar accelerators formed crosslinks with longer sulfur chains, that is, more polysulfidic in nature, while accelerators with higher polarity produced networks with shorter sulfur crosslinks.

Polymer Engineering and ScienceVol. 66(2)
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN), Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (India) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.