Budburst timing within a functional trait framework

Abstract Phenology, the timing of recurring life history events, can vary substantially in different environments and for different species. While climate change has shifted phenology by altering its environmental triggers, such as temperature, changes in the drivers that select for species‐level variation remain poorly explained. Theory suggests that species‐level variation in phenology can result from shifting environmental pressures that favour different strategies across the spring growing season: from the early season, where higher abiotic risks and greater availability of nutrients and light favour cheaper leaves and acquisitive growth strategies, to later, when a more benign environment and lower levels of light and nutrients favour conservative growth strategies. This framework predicts a suite of traits that may covary with species phenologies, but the high variability in phenology across environments has made testing its role within a trait framework challenging. Using a modelling framework that accommodates this variability, with phenological data from a database of controlled environment experiments and tree trait data from two major databases we tested for relationships between traits and spring phenology in trees. Specifically, we examined the cues that drive early to late budburst: spring temperatures (forcing), winter temperatures (chilling) and daylength (photoperiod). We found mixed support for our predictions for how traits relate to budburst timing and phenology. Species with cues that lead to earlier budburst (small responses to experimental chilling and photoperiod) were shorter with higher leaf nitrogen content, both traits related to acquisitive strategies and thus are in line with our predictions. However, our one reproductive trait of seed mass showed no relationship with phenology, and other traits (e.g. specific leaf area) showed relationships in the opposite direction to our predictions. Synthesis : Our findings show how spring budburst phenology partially fits within a functional trait framework of acquisitive to conservative growth strategies. Leveraging these relationships could improve predictions of how communities shift in their growth strategies alongside changing phenology with future warming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecology
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70196
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Budburst timing within a functional trait framework

C. J. Chamberlain, Ailene K. Ettinger, D. M. Buonaiuto, Mira Garner et al.
Journal of Ecology
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Budburst timing within a functional trait framework

C. J. Chamberlain, Ailene K. Ettinger, D. M. Buonaiuto, Mira Garner, Geoffrey Legault, Darwin S. Sodhi, E. M. Wolkovich, Ignacio Morales‐Castilla, Deirdre Loughnan, Faith A. M. Jones
article en

Abstract

Abstract Phenology, the timing of recurring life history events, can vary substantially in different environments and for different species. While climate change has shifted phenology by altering its environmental triggers, such as temperature, changes in the drivers that select for species‐level variation remain poorly explained. Theory suggests that species‐level variation in phenology can result from shifting environmental pressures that favour different strategies across the spring growing season: from the early season, where higher abiotic risks and greater availability of nutrients and light favour cheaper leaves and acquisitive growth strategies, to later, when a more benign environment and lower levels of light and nutrients favour conservative growth strategies. This framework predicts a suite of traits that may covary with species phenologies, but the high variability in phenology across environments has made testing its role within a trait framework challenging. Using a modelling framework that accommodates this variability, with phenological data from a database of controlled environment experiments and tree trait data from two major databases we tested for relationships between traits and spring phenology in trees. Specifically, we examined the cues that drive early to late budburst: spring temperatures (forcing), winter temperatures (chilling) and daylength (photoperiod). We found mixed support for our predictions for how traits relate to budburst timing and phenology. Species with cues that lead to earlier budburst (small responses to experimental chilling and photoperiod) were shorter with higher leaf nitrogen content, both traits related to acquisitive strategies and thus are in line with our predictions. However, our one reproductive trait of seed mass showed no relationship with phenology, and other traits (e.g. specific leaf area) showed relationships in the opposite direction to our predictions. Synthesis : Our findings show how spring budburst phenology partially fits within a functional trait framework of acquisitive to conservative growth strategies. Leveraging these relationships could improve predictions of how communities shift in their growth strategies alongside changing phenology with future warming.

Journal of EcologyVol. 113(12)
The Nature Conservancy (US), Harvard University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Evolutionary Genomics (United States) (US), Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.