Explaining <scp>3D</scp> Semantic Segmentation Through Generative <scp>AI</scp> ‐Based Counterfactuals

ABSTRACT Interpreting the predictions of deep learning models on 3D point cloud data is an important challenge for safety‐critical domains such as autonomous driving, robotics and geospatial analysis. Existing counterfactual explainability methods often struggle with the sparsity and unordered nature of 3D point clouds. To address this, we introduce a generative framework for counterfactual explanations in 3D semantic segmentation models. Our approach leverages autoencoder‐based latent representations, combined with UMAP embeddings and Delaunay triangulation, to construct a graph that enables geodesic path search between semantic classes. Candidate counterfactuals are generated by interpolating latent vectors along these paths and decoding into plausible point clouds, while semantic plausibility is guided by the predictions of a 3D semantic segmentation model. We evaluate the framework on ShapeNet objects, demonstrating that semantically related classes yield realistic counterfactuals with minimal geometric change, whereas unrelated classes expose sharp decision boundaries and reduced plausibility. Quantitative results confirm that the method balances defined interpretability metrics, producing counterfactuals that are both interpretable and geometrically consistent. Overall, our work demonstrates that generative counterfactuals in latent space provide a promising alternative to input‐level perturbations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.70163
Citations
2
Primary Topic
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining 3D Semantic Segmentation Through Generative AI ‐Based Counterfactuals

Javier Del Ser, Karl Stampfer, Arne Nothdurft, Christoph Gollob et al.
2 citations
Expert Systems
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
2.67
article

Explaining 3D Semantic Segmentation Through Generative AI ‐Based Counterfactuals

Javier Del Ser, Karl Stampfer, Arne Nothdurft, Christoph Gollob, Niko Lukač, Andreas Holzinger, Stefan Schweng, Dzemail Rozajac
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Interpreting the predictions of deep learning models on 3D point cloud data is an important challenge for safety‐critical domains such as autonomous driving, robotics and geospatial analysis. Existing counterfactual explainability methods often struggle with the sparsity and unordered nature of 3D point clouds. To address this, we introduce a generative framework for counterfactual explanations in 3D semantic segmentation models. Our approach leverages autoencoder‐based latent representations, combined with UMAP embeddings and Delaunay triangulation, to construct a graph that enables geodesic path search between semantic classes. Candidate counterfactuals are generated by interpolating latent vectors along these paths and decoding into plausible point clouds, while semantic plausibility is guided by the predictions of a 3D semantic segmentation model. We evaluate the framework on ShapeNet objects, demonstrating that semantically related classes yield realistic counterfactuals with minimal geometric change, whereas unrelated classes expose sharp decision boundaries and reduced plausibility. Quantitative results confirm that the method balances defined interpretability metrics, producing counterfactuals that are both interpretable and geometrically consistent. Overall, our work demonstrates that generative counterfactuals in latent space provide a promising alternative to input‐level perturbations.

Expert SystemsVol. 42(12)
University of the Basque Country (ES), University of Maribor (SI), Graz University of Technology (AT), Euskadiko Parke Teknologikoa (ES), Institute for Biodiversity (DE), BOKU University (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
2.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.