Validation and Comparison of Live Microorganism Plating Analytical Procedures Following United States Pharmacopeia (USP) <1220> and <1210>

Properly validated procedures can reduce variation and lead to data that is more accurate and precise. Analytical procedure lifecycle management (APLM) is a statistical approach based on uncertainty measurements that validates procedures by demonstrating they are fit for purpose. APLM results can also be used to compare procedures. This paper builds upon previous publications that introduced, developed, and demonstrated the application of APLM as described in USP <1220> to a microbiological analytical procedure. The application of APLM is demonstrated in two MS EXCEL workbooks that are provided: <i>Template APLM</i>, that can be used to apply APLM to any microbiological plate count procedure and <i>Case Study APLM</i> detailing the APLM validation and comparison of enumeration procedures associated with a <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> probiotic ingredient. The measurand and analytical target profile are clearly defined, a risk assessment is documented, and an analytical control strategy created. Two different procedures, ISO 20128 and USP <64>, are compared using tolerance intervals (TI) calculated from the procedures' uncertainties. Tools to ease validation and comparison and all required statistical equations are contained within the workbooks. Case study data, which is based on a <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i>, single-strain, powdered ingredient, was generated in a manufacturing facility laboratory. This example of using APLM validated ISO 20128 as fit for the purpose of enumerating L. acidophilus in a powdered probiotic ingredient by showing that the intermediate precision (0.062 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) was less than the target measurement uncertainty (0.097 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g). When comparing ISO 20128 to USP <64> overlapping tolerance intervals were observed; 11.14-11.76 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g and 11.41 to 11.62 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, respectively. The results indicate the procedures are similar, but not equivalent. Options for using APLM and TI information are discussed. This study shows that APLM and tolerance intervals are useful tools that improve and ease procedure selection, assist in information gathering that leads to better understanding and control of analytical procedures, and helps improve data quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dietary Supplements
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19390211.2025.2583511
Primary Topic
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation and Comparison of Live Microorganism Plating Analytical Procedures Following United States Pharmacopeia (USP) <1220> and <1210>

Jean L. Schoeni, Christina S. Vegge, Marco Pane, Jean‐Marc Roussel et al.
Journal of Dietary Supplements
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
article

Validation and Comparison of Live Microorganism Plating Analytical Procedures Following United States Pharmacopeia (USP) <1220> and <1210>

Jean L. Schoeni, Christina S. Vegge, Marco Pane, Jean‐Marc Roussel, Virginia S. Goldman, Binu Koshy, Pierre Burguière, M. L. Jane Weitzel, Scott A. Jackson
article en

Abstract

Properly validated procedures can reduce variation and lead to data that is more accurate and precise. Analytical procedure lifecycle management (APLM) is a statistical approach based on uncertainty measurements that validates procedures by demonstrating they are fit for purpose. APLM results can also be used to compare procedures. This paper builds upon previous publications that introduced, developed, and demonstrated the application of APLM as described in USP <1220> to a microbiological analytical procedure. The application of APLM is demonstrated in two MS EXCEL workbooks that are provided: <i>Template APLM</i>, that can be used to apply APLM to any microbiological plate count procedure and <i>Case Study APLM</i> detailing the APLM validation and comparison of enumeration procedures associated with a <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> probiotic ingredient. The measurand and analytical target profile are clearly defined, a risk assessment is documented, and an analytical control strategy created. Two different procedures, ISO 20128 and USP <64>, are compared using tolerance intervals (TI) calculated from the procedures' uncertainties. Tools to ease validation and comparison and all required statistical equations are contained within the workbooks. Case study data, which is based on a <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i>, single-strain, powdered ingredient, was generated in a manufacturing facility laboratory. This example of using APLM validated ISO 20128 as fit for the purpose of enumerating L. acidophilus in a powdered probiotic ingredient by showing that the intermediate precision (0.062 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) was less than the target measurement uncertainty (0.097 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g). When comparing ISO 20128 to USP <64> overlapping tolerance intervals were observed; 11.14-11.76 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g and 11.41 to 11.62 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, respectively. The results indicate the procedures are similar, but not equivalent. Options for using APLM and TI information are discussed. This study shows that APLM and tolerance intervals are useful tools that improve and ease procedure selection, assist in information gathering that leads to better understanding and control of analytical procedures, and helps improve data quality.

Journal of Dietary SupplementsVol. 23(1)
Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique (FR), Discovery Centre (CA), United States Pharmacopeial Convention (US), Independent Sector (US), Probiotical (Italy) (IT), Probi (SE), Eurofins (France) (FR), Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.