The Moral Wall: Explaining Participation and Non-participation in Political Violence and Terrorism from a Survey of the Provisional IRA

Why some people participate in political violence and terrorism, and others do not, even when they share ideological frames, identities, perceptions, grievances and interests, neighborhoods or social networks, and are generally from similar contexts and backgrounds, and share similar experiences, is a puzzle for social scientists. When individuals share values, environments and experiences, their motivations for violent action should be similar, leading to similar levels of participation. In fact, we find from our survey of the Provisional IRA that the opposite is the case. A moral wall of preparedness to kill and die for a cause is the key distinction between participants and non-participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2025.2580942
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Moral Wall: Explaining Participation and Non-participation in Political Violence and Terrorism from a Survey of the Provisional IRA

James Hughes, Anar Ahmadov
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
Political Conflict and Governance
article

The Moral Wall: Explaining Participation and Non-participation in Political Violence and Terrorism from a Survey of the Provisional IRA

James Hughes, Anar Ahmadov
article en

Abstract

Why some people participate in political violence and terrorism, and others do not, even when they share ideological frames, identities, perceptions, grievances and interests, neighborhoods or social networks, and are generally from similar contexts and backgrounds, and share similar experiences, is a puzzle for social scientists. When individuals share values, environments and experiences, their motivations for violent action should be similar, leading to similar levels of participation. In fact, we find from our survey of the Provisional IRA that the opposite is the case. A moral wall of preparedness to kill and die for a cause is the key distinction between participants and non-participants.

Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
Leiden University (NL), Hague Institute for Global Justice (NL), Government of the United Kingdom (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.