Home Testing for Contagious Illness: Historical Context and Modern Caveats

Dozens of over-the-counter tests offer to evaluate users for an array of contagious illnesses, including sexually transmitted infections, acute respiratory infections like coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza, and complicated chronic infections like Lyme disease, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Diagnosing any of these conditions in a home setting raises both logistical and ethical issues that may prevent home testing from becoming the public health benefit its advocates envision. Over the last century, early home tests such as the first urine glucose screening tests for diabetes and the first home pregnancy tests generated very similar expectations of substantial public health benefits. These tests helped many individual patients, but neither proved to be a particularly effective public health tool. Home testing for contagious illness raises additional issues of quarantine, contact tracing, and treatment that are yet to be addressed in any systematic way. The widespread enthusiasm for patching suboptimal healthcare systems with home testing seems premature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf623
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Home Testing for Contagious Illness: Historical Context and Modern Caveats

Abigail Zuger
Clinical Infectious Diseases
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
article

Home Testing for Contagious Illness: Historical Context and Modern Caveats

Abigail Zuger
article en

Abstract

Dozens of over-the-counter tests offer to evaluate users for an array of contagious illnesses, including sexually transmitted infections, acute respiratory infections like coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza, and complicated chronic infections like Lyme disease, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Diagnosing any of these conditions in a home setting raises both logistical and ethical issues that may prevent home testing from becoming the public health benefit its advocates envision. Over the last century, early home tests such as the first urine glucose screening tests for diabetes and the first home pregnancy tests generated very similar expectations of substantial public health benefits. These tests helped many individual patients, but neither proved to be a particularly effective public health tool. Home testing for contagious illness raises additional issues of quarantine, contact tracing, and treatment that are yet to be addressed in any systematic way. The widespread enthusiasm for patching suboptimal healthcare systems with home testing seems premature.

Clinical Infectious DiseasesVol. 82(1)
New York City Department of Correction (US), New York Proton Center (US), Film Independent (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.