Determining Terminal Velocities of Selected Insects and Substitute Materials to Develop Future Test Procedures for Insect‐Friendly Mowing Technology

ABSTRACT Agricultural grasslands are vital habitats for insects that provide key ecosystem services. However, conventional rotary mowers are proposed to cause significant insect mortality due to the high rotational speed of their blades and the resulting airflow. Therefore, innovative insect‐friendly mowers with modified airflows are developed to reduce the suction effect on grassland arthropods. However, no standardised and cost‐effective testing methods are currently available for these technologies. Here, we present a promising approach for future testing of insect‐friendly mowers. We determined the terminal velocities of grassland insects as well as materials that could potentially replace insects in standardised tests. In a comparative analysis of the terminal velocities of 15 insect species and nine substitute materials, we identified several substitutes with terminal velocities closely matching those of the tested insects. These materials are highly suitable for laboratory testing of insect‐friendly mowing techniques, particularly for evaluating the airflow and suction effects of the blades. Although substitute materials cannot replicate the natural responses of living insects to airflow, they provide a possible solution for standardised and scalable testing. This approach paves the way for a broader adoption of insect‐friendly mowing technologies, ensuring a balance between agricultural productivity and insect conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Entomology
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.70032
Primary Topic
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining Terminal Velocities of Selected Insects and Substitute Materials to Develop Future Test Procedures for Insect‐Friendly Mowing Technology

Oliver Betz, Stefan Böttinger, Manuela Sann, Stefanie Erhardt et al.
Journal of Applied Entomology
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
article

Determining Terminal Velocities of Selected Insects and Substitute Materials to Develop Future Test Procedures for Insect‐Friendly Mowing Technology

Oliver Betz, Stefan Böttinger, Manuela Sann, Stefanie Erhardt, Johannes L. M. Steidle, Lea von Berg, J. Howard Frank
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Agricultural grasslands are vital habitats for insects that provide key ecosystem services. However, conventional rotary mowers are proposed to cause significant insect mortality due to the high rotational speed of their blades and the resulting airflow. Therefore, innovative insect‐friendly mowers with modified airflows are developed to reduce the suction effect on grassland arthropods. However, no standardised and cost‐effective testing methods are currently available for these technologies. Here, we present a promising approach for future testing of insect‐friendly mowers. We determined the terminal velocities of grassland insects as well as materials that could potentially replace insects in standardised tests. In a comparative analysis of the terminal velocities of 15 insect species and nine substitute materials, we identified several substitutes with terminal velocities closely matching those of the tested insects. These materials are highly suitable for laboratory testing of insect‐friendly mowing techniques, particularly for evaluating the airflow and suction effects of the blades. Although substitute materials cannot replicate the natural responses of living insects to airflow, they provide a possible solution for standardised and scalable testing. This approach paves the way for a broader adoption of insect‐friendly mowing technologies, ensuring a balance between agricultural productivity and insect conservation.

Journal of Applied EntomologyVol. 150(3)
University of Hohenheim (DE), Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment (DE), Natural History Museum of Bern (CH), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES)
Bundesamt für Naturschutz
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.