A statistics-based aggregation method for life cycle sustainability assessment

Currently, two main approaches are used in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), the comparative and the integrated approaches. Comparative approaches employ multiple indicators and visualizations to assess LCSA, whereas integrated approaches aggregate the impacts across the three pillars of LCSA into a single sustainability index. However, both methods tend to be either complex for decision-making or involve subjectivity. This paper addresses these limitations by proposing a statistics-based aggregation method that reduces complexity and subjectivity in LCSA. The theory behind the proposed method is the conceptual equation of LCSA, where LCSA = Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) + Life Cycle Costing (LCC) + Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). Since the method aggregates impacts, its logic can be represented using a Venn diagram, and probability rules are applied for the aggregation. Impact categories in LCA, LCC, and S-LCA are quantified following standardized LCA steps. The method constructs cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) for each impact category, with scores computed from their respective CDFs. Probability rules are applied to aggregate the impact categories. A case study on crumb rubber production demonstrates the method’s applicability, showing that the resulting LCSA impact score reflects the geographical location of the process and is sensitive to the selected impact categories. A step-by-step procedure is also provided to guide implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02159-9
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A statistics-based aggregation method for life cycle sustainability assessment

Feri Afrinaldi, Pramadana Agsha
Discover Sustainability
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

A statistics-based aggregation method for life cycle sustainability assessment

Feri Afrinaldi, Pramadana Agsha
article en

Abstract

Currently, two main approaches are used in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), the comparative and the integrated approaches. Comparative approaches employ multiple indicators and visualizations to assess LCSA, whereas integrated approaches aggregate the impacts across the three pillars of LCSA into a single sustainability index. However, both methods tend to be either complex for decision-making or involve subjectivity. This paper addresses these limitations by proposing a statistics-based aggregation method that reduces complexity and subjectivity in LCSA. The theory behind the proposed method is the conceptual equation of LCSA, where LCSA = Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) + Life Cycle Costing (LCC) + Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). Since the method aggregates impacts, its logic can be represented using a Venn diagram, and probability rules are applied for the aggregation. Impact categories in LCA, LCC, and S-LCA are quantified following standardized LCA steps. The method constructs cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) for each impact category, with scores computed from their respective CDFs. Probability rules are applied to aggregate the impact categories. A case study on crumb rubber production demonstrates the method’s applicability, showing that the resulting LCSA impact score reflects the geographical location of the process and is sensitive to the selected impact categories. A step-by-step procedure is also provided to guide implementation.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 6(1)
Andalas University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.