Who is responsible for follow-up after critical illness? GP, ICU and patient perspectives
The experiences of healthcare professionals and patients indicate the current lack of clarity could negatively impacting patient care and outcomes. Consensus is required on how we should define the boundaries of critical illness sequalae, and which clinical groups are responsible for care across the various transitions of care experienced by intensive care unit (ICU) survivors.
Authors
- Richard Mayne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9843-678X)
- Judy Martina Bradley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7423-135X)
- Joshua C. Anderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-9054)
- Nina Leggett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1886-5526)
- Daniel Francis McAuley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-1947)
- Jonathan E. Stewart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5649-9355)
- Nigel Hart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8168-1746)
Institutions
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- University of Ulster (GB)
- Western Health (AU)
- Royal Victoria Hospital (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2025-11-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05724-w
- Primary Topic
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Public Health Agency