Advanced non-invasive respiratory support in resource-constrained settings: a narrative review

Advanced non-invasive respiratory support techniques include high flow oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and non-invasive ventilation. Given their relative simplicity and lower resource intensity as compared with invasive mechanical ventilation, these mechanisms of respiratory support represent an attractive opportunity for use in patients with acute respiratory failure in resource-constrained settings. High flow oxygen in particular has the potential to provide high levels of respiratory support with relatively low levels of human and other resources to a wide variety of patients with respiratory failure, including those with delirium or obtundation. Even after the COVID-19 pandemic, during which utilization of these techniques increased in high-income countries, low and lower-middle income countries still have little access to advanced non-invasive respiratory support. Evidence from high-income countries and limited evidence from low-income countries suggest that these respiratory support methods may be particularly beneficial in resource-constrained settings; however, the evidence also suggests that the populations chosen and particularly the attention and resources invested in implementation are critical in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of non-invasive support. While non-invasive respiratory support does not require the complex training and monitoring needed for invasive support (e.g. specific risks associated with the endotracheal tube, sequelae of sedation, complex ventilator modes), it nonetheless requires resources in order to be applied effectively. Particular domains that need careful consideration are: clinical systems of care; oxygen consumption and connector compatibilities; human resources and training; location within the hospital; acceptability; cost; and device characteristics. In addition, ongoing research is needed that includes randomized controlled trials with attention to context, so that clinicians in resource-constrained settings can apply relevant evidence for non-invasive respiratory support for patients in their settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05688-x
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced non-invasive respiratory support in resource-constrained settings: a narrative review

Théogène Twagirumugabe, Elisabeth D. Riviello, Doris Uwamahoro, Dona Fabiola Gashame
Critical Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Advanced non-invasive respiratory support in resource-constrained settings: a narrative review

Théogène Twagirumugabe, Elisabeth D. Riviello, Doris Uwamahoro, Dona Fabiola Gashame
article en

Abstract

Advanced non-invasive respiratory support techniques include high flow oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and non-invasive ventilation. Given their relative simplicity and lower resource intensity as compared with invasive mechanical ventilation, these mechanisms of respiratory support represent an attractive opportunity for use in patients with acute respiratory failure in resource-constrained settings. High flow oxygen in particular has the potential to provide high levels of respiratory support with relatively low levels of human and other resources to a wide variety of patients with respiratory failure, including those with delirium or obtundation. Even after the COVID-19 pandemic, during which utilization of these techniques increased in high-income countries, low and lower-middle income countries still have little access to advanced non-invasive respiratory support. Evidence from high-income countries and limited evidence from low-income countries suggest that these respiratory support methods may be particularly beneficial in resource-constrained settings; however, the evidence also suggests that the populations chosen and particularly the attention and resources invested in implementation are critical in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of non-invasive support. While non-invasive respiratory support does not require the complex training and monitoring needed for invasive support (e.g. specific risks associated with the endotracheal tube, sequelae of sedation, complex ventilator modes), it nonetheless requires resources in order to be applied effectively. Particular domains that need careful consideration are: clinical systems of care; oxygen consumption and connector compatibilities; human resources and training; location within the hospital; acceptability; cost; and device characteristics. In addition, ongoing research is needed that includes randomized controlled trials with attention to context, so that clinicians in resource-constrained settings can apply relevant evidence for non-invasive respiratory support for patients in their settings.

Critical CareVol. 29(1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of Rwanda (RW), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (RW), University Teaching Hospital of Butare (RW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.