Performance of Five Thai Versions of Sarcopenia Screening Questionnaires (SARC-F, SARC-CalF, MSRA-7, MSRA-5, and Modified MSRA-5) in Thai Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The external validity of sarcopenia screening questionnaires in the elderly has been examined in several conditions but rarely evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to determine the performance of five Thai versions of sarcopenia screening questionnaires (SARC-F [Strength, Assistance with walking, Rising from a chair, Climbing stairs, and Falls], SARC-CalF [SARC-F plus calf circumference], MSRA [Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment]-7, MSRA-5, and modified MSRA-5 questionnaires) in Thai RA patients, and evaluate the correlations among these instruments. <b>Methods</b>: In this cross-sectional study, consecutive adult RA patients (aged ≥20 years) from an outpatient rheumatology clinic completed the five sarcopenia screening questionnaires listed above. Sarcopenia was defined according to criteria of the 2019 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS). Appendicular skeletal muscle mass, grip strength, and physical performance were assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis, a hand dynamometer, and a 6 m gait speed test, respectively. The cut-off values used for each sarcopenia screening questionnaire were pre-specified according to their respective established thresholds. <b>Results</b>: Of 299 RA patients (89.0% female, mean age of 61.3 ± 11.6 years, median [interquartile range] disease duration of 12.8 [8.2, 20.0] years), 37.5% and 27.4% of them had sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the SARC-F, SARC-CalF, MSRA-7, MSRA-5, and modified MSRA-5 questionnaires were 0.60, 0.74, 0.65, 0.62, and 0.65, respectively, with sensitivities of 34.8%, 73.2%, 77.7%, 68.8%, and 72.3% and specificities of 84.5%, 75.4%, 51.3%, 55.1%, and 58.3%, respectively. SARC-F demonstrated moderate correlations with the other questionnaires: SARC-CalF (r = 0.57), MSRA-7 (r = -0.52), MSRA-5 (r = -0.55), and modified MSRA-5 (r = -0.65), all with a <i>p</i>-value of <0.001. <b>Conclusions</b>: Sarcopenia is common among Thai RA patients. SARC-CalF had the best balance of sensitivity and specificity and is likely the most suitable sarcopenia screening questionnaire for Thai RA patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228029
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Five Thai Versions of Sarcopenia Screening Questionnaires (SARC-F, SARC-CalF, MSRA-7, MSRA-5, and Modified MSRA-5) in Thai Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Phichayut Phinyo, Worawit Louthrenoo, Wanitcha Gumtorntip, Nuntana Kasitanon
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Performance of Five Thai Versions of Sarcopenia Screening Questionnaires (SARC-F, SARC-CalF, MSRA-7, MSRA-5, and Modified MSRA-5) in Thai Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Phichayut Phinyo, Worawit Louthrenoo, Wanitcha Gumtorntip, Nuntana Kasitanon
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The external validity of sarcopenia screening questionnaires in the elderly has been examined in several conditions but rarely evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to determine the performance of five Thai versions of sarcopenia screening questionnaires (SARC-F [Strength, Assistance with walking, Rising from a chair, Climbing stairs, and Falls], SARC-CalF [SARC-F plus calf circumference], MSRA [Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment]-7, MSRA-5, and modified MSRA-5 questionnaires) in Thai RA patients, and evaluate the correlations among these instruments. <b>Methods</b>: In this cross-sectional study, consecutive adult RA patients (aged ≥20 years) from an outpatient rheumatology clinic completed the five sarcopenia screening questionnaires listed above. Sarcopenia was defined according to criteria of the 2019 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS). Appendicular skeletal muscle mass, grip strength, and physical performance were assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis, a hand dynamometer, and a 6 m gait speed test, respectively. The cut-off values used for each sarcopenia screening questionnaire were pre-specified according to their respective established thresholds. <b>Results</b>: Of 299 RA patients (89.0% female, mean age of 61.3 ± 11.6 years, median [interquartile range] disease duration of 12.8 [8.2, 20.0] years), 37.5% and 27.4% of them had sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the SARC-F, SARC-CalF, MSRA-7, MSRA-5, and modified MSRA-5 questionnaires were 0.60, 0.74, 0.65, 0.62, and 0.65, respectively, with sensitivities of 34.8%, 73.2%, 77.7%, 68.8%, and 72.3% and specificities of 84.5%, 75.4%, 51.3%, 55.1%, and 58.3%, respectively. SARC-F demonstrated moderate correlations with the other questionnaires: SARC-CalF (r = 0.57), MSRA-7 (r = -0.52), MSRA-5 (r = -0.55), and modified MSRA-5 (r = -0.65), all with a <i>p</i>-value of <0.001. <b>Conclusions</b>: Sarcopenia is common among Thai RA patients. SARC-CalF had the best balance of sensitivity and specificity and is likely the most suitable sarcopenia screening questionnaire for Thai RA patients.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(22)
Chiang Mai University (TH)
Chiang Mai University, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.