Modern Technologies Supporting Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Narrative Review

<b>Introduction:</b> Stroke remains one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide. Post-stroke motor recovery depends on neuroplasticity, which is stimulated by intensive, repetitive, and task-specific training. Modern technologies such as robotic rehabilitation (RR), virtual reality (VR), functional electrical stimulation (FES), brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), and non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) offer novel opportunities to enhance rehabilitation. They operate through sensory feedback, neuromodulation, and robotic assistance which promote neural reorganization and motor relearning. <b>Neurobiological Basis of Motor Recovery:</b> Mechanisms such as long-term potentiation, mirror neuron activation, and cerebellar modulation underpin functional reorganization after stroke. <b>Literature Review Methodology:</b> A narrative review was conducted of studies published between 2005 and 2025 using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and systematic reviews assessing the efficacy of these modern technologies were analyzed. <b>Literature Review:</b> Evidence indicates that RR, VR, FES, BCIs, and NIBS improve upper and lower limb motor function and strength, and enhance activities of daily living, particularly when combined with conventional physiotherapy (CP). Furthermore, integrated rehabilitation technologies (IRT) demonstrate synergistic neuroplastic effects. <b>Discussion:</b> Modern technologies enhance therapy precision, intensity, and motivation but face challenges related to cost, standardization, and methodological heterogeneity. <b>Conclusions</b>: RR, VR, FES, BCIs, NIBS, and IRT are effective complements to CP. Early, individualized, and standardized implementation can optimize neuroplasticity and functional recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228035
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern Technologies Supporting Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Narrative Review

Iwona Sarzyńska‐Długosz, Denis Moskiewicz
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
2.05
article

Modern Technologies Supporting Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Narrative Review

Iwona Sarzyńska‐Długosz, Denis Moskiewicz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Stroke remains one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide. Post-stroke motor recovery depends on neuroplasticity, which is stimulated by intensive, repetitive, and task-specific training. Modern technologies such as robotic rehabilitation (RR), virtual reality (VR), functional electrical stimulation (FES), brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), and non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) offer novel opportunities to enhance rehabilitation. They operate through sensory feedback, neuromodulation, and robotic assistance which promote neural reorganization and motor relearning. <b>Neurobiological Basis of Motor Recovery:</b> Mechanisms such as long-term potentiation, mirror neuron activation, and cerebellar modulation underpin functional reorganization after stroke. <b>Literature Review Methodology:</b> A narrative review was conducted of studies published between 2005 and 2025 using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and systematic reviews assessing the efficacy of these modern technologies were analyzed. <b>Literature Review:</b> Evidence indicates that RR, VR, FES, BCIs, and NIBS improve upper and lower limb motor function and strength, and enhance activities of daily living, particularly when combined with conventional physiotherapy (CP). Furthermore, integrated rehabilitation technologies (IRT) demonstrate synergistic neuroplastic effects. <b>Discussion:</b> Modern technologies enhance therapy precision, intensity, and motivation but face challenges related to cost, standardization, and methodological heterogeneity. <b>Conclusions</b>: RR, VR, FES, BCIs, NIBS, and IRT are effective complements to CP. Early, individualized, and standardized implementation can optimize neuroplasticity and functional recovery.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(22)
Szpital im Tadeusza Marciniaka (PL), Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences (PL), Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.